We’ve had some trouble recently with posts from aggregator links like Google Amp, MSN, and Yahoo.

We’re now requiring links go to the OG source, and not a conduit.

In an example like this, it can give the wrong attribution to the MBFC bot, and can give a more or less reliable rating than the original source, but it also makes it harder to run down duplicates.

So anything not linked to the original source, but is stuck on Google Amp, MSN, Yahoo, etc. will be removed.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    93·
    2 months ago

    People usually link to sites like MSN and Yahoo because the content is no longer locked behind a paywall. 🤷‍♂️

    • geekwithsoul@lemm.eeEnglish
      83·
      2 months ago

      Many of the articles I’ve seen are not in fact behind a paywall but obviously YMMV

      • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
        11·
        2 months ago

        What seems reasonable to me is, if someone is willing to make the optional effort to do so, to link the original paywalled source as the primary link, but then either add the paywall-free MSN/Yahoo/AMP link at the bottom of the description or in a comment. It looks like this would still be in line with the updated rules, but would prevent duplicate posts (one posts only the paywall free version and one posts only with a paywall link).

        • geekwithsoul@lemm.eeEnglish
          12·
          2 months ago

          There’s much better ways to do archive links that deal with paywalls, e.g. archive.is and others. News aggregators should not be relied on for archival links, as a link that works today may not work a year from now, as corporate agreements/ownership change

          • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
            1·
            2 months ago

            Ah, that’s a good point that I hadn’t considered. You’re right.

            Of course there might be that rare exception - where the archivers can’t get past the paywall on the original site, but it’s available from MSN or something.

            Even so, it seems like as a general rule, prefer to use an archiver, and fall back to a news aggregator only as a last resort, and then archive the news aggregator’s page so it’s retained even if the aggregator drops the article later on. Am I on the right track here?

            (Current example, https://archive.ph/nugTi did not succeed in getting https://theintercept.com/2024/10/09/white-house-oct-7-israel-war-gaza/ - in the past I’ve seen this overcome by archiving from the Google Cache’d version or from a version archived in the Wayback machine, but Google Cache was killed by Google and archive.org is currently down still over this holiday weekend.)

            • geekwithsoul@lemm.eeEnglish
              12·
              2 months ago

              BTW, for that site and others with more of a nagwall rather than a paywall, viewing it in reader view takes care of the popup (and many Lemmy clients can be set to default to reader view for links)

              • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
                1·
                2 months ago

                Thanks, the tip about the reader view solves the original issue (on reading nagwalled articles). I run my own pyfedi/piefed instance so I’d be surprised if I could use a lemmy client, but I’ll keep it in mind.

                If only there was a way I could feed my reader view into archive.is (which would solve the other issue, that of preserving the article in case the original ever goes down).

    • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
      216·
      2 months ago

      Yep, that was a big reason. I subscribe to a few sites, but I realize not everyone does. And MSN links came up on my newsreader, but I have no problem just posting from direct sites. I do expect people will complain about the paywall though, but oh well.