Unfortunately that kind of thing is probably only going to increase as we get closer to Election Day.

Oh, there’s definitely blame to go around, but not holding Trump to at least some standard would be compounding the mistakes of the past.

No one can argue someone else out of being a Trump supporter, but I still believe there’s a chance to justifiably mock him enough to maybe change some minds. If more coverage focused on how laughably batshit insane he was instead of “ooh, look, he’s not following convention and he’s breaking the rules” it would help a lot. His lot can’t abide weaknesses and he’s definitely weak.

I mean, it’s important that it keeps getting called out. Too many journalists have been sanitizing his appearances and not making it clear he’s literally off his rocker

As all you can do tonight is whatever weird trolling thing you’re doing, I’m afraid I must go for now.

Hope you bring your A game when I come back later. I know you can do better!

I quite clearly did not say anything close to that as you know. Falling back on more trolling? Now I’m disappointed, bud.

Uh huh. So we’re now going for “pretend to be confused by common American idioms and turns of phrase”? You are being so versatile today! Really proud of you bud!

Quite clearly I don’t as I just posted the actual information as to who is voting for him.

And no, I said “Absolutely screams only the kind of privilege you see in middle class, white, cis, hetero males.” So if that’s your demographic or not, the kind of privilege you give constant voice to is an often associated with that demographic. Or are you once again denying that demographic has historically “othered” everything else? Bold play, if so my friend.

I don’t look at numbers or popularity.

Sure, add those to the list of things you don’t look at. That list is getting pretty long though, isn’t? Does someone need to send you some more paper?

Fingers crossed you don’t get hand cramps friend!

Reported for trolling

What do you mean by privileged? I’m not in the demographic that you tried to portray as privileged.

You do realize that people of all colors vote for Trump, right? Do you think that ONLY white middle class people vote for Trump?! lol

I never said you were in that demographic. Try reading what I wrote again, but slower.

As for Trump supporters, maybe you’re too naive to know this already but we know exactly what demographics they’re most likely in:

Source: Pew Research

Oh, is there a reading comprehension problem on your end? My apologies! What words do you need help with?

Well, to be fair you did manage to get twelve whole subscribers, so that’s probably already exceeding what SWP will receive in votes in your state. Who knows, with their one whole candidate event next month, you may actually be their most effective outreach. Proud of you bud!

Oops! I made the mistake of reading more again and just realized how …sparse mention of Fruit is there. You actually seem to be a much more effective outreach for “vague socialism vibes”. The important thing is that you’re doing the best that you can, friend!

I mean, other than the fact that you’re obviously so privileged — as you’ve said so often — to not be afraid of Trump winning. And then so oblivious, callous, and dismissive of other people who are justifiably worried that you spend an inordinate amount of time trying to persuade folks that voting third party in the presidential race is a justifiable idea.

And unfortunately third party wankers do have both a chance at helping Trump win AND having no chance to win themselves. Or did you already forget the fine print in the Quinnipac poll you yourself posted this morning? So there is a great moral peril and a frivolous display, and actual adults should have no trouble telling one from the other.

Believe it or not, unlike you I don’t follow people around and interject myself in comment threads ten deep. So happy you have such an active outlet for your…

Oh wait, hmm, that looks pretty sad actually. Not many takers, huh? Latest four posts are all from you over three days and you can’t even manage to get upvoted in your own community. I’d say it was hilarious that you thought that was evidence of something, but now you’ve just made me sad friend.

Ah yes - “Pretend confusion followed by dramatic exaggerated disgust (from obvious twist of words)”

Playing the classics!

Ha! You are a precious snowflake my friend! I offered no condemnation or even opinion on any of those things. Strange that’s where your mind went to though.

I just suggested that you evidenced the kind of privilege really only ever seen amongst a certain demographic. Are you saying people in that demographic aren’t privileged? Are you denying the systemic oppression to women and people of color? The enforced economic disadvantage on the poor and working class?!

It’s almost laughable that you call yourself a socialist.

Also, I do really like Claudia de la Cruz, but I’m not voting for her. Thank you!

Oh right, you’re supporting Fruit - who has ONE event in the next month. https://themilitant.com/events/ Sorry, you just spend all your time talking about literally anyone else, I guess it slipped my mind.

And they only have access to 25 out of 538 electors because of how limited their ballot access is. Really backing a dynamic and legitimate campaign there, friend! So brave.

That’s okay, no one with any brains is voting for yours. Since you switched from Stein, your candidate won’t even crack .05%. So while half the country may vote against my candidate, at least 99.95% aren’t voting for yours.

Harris has talked repeatedly about her work taking down sex traffickers. Usually within the context of her work against transnational gangs.

“I went after transnational gangs, drug cartels and human traffickers that came into our country illegally. I prosecuted them in case after case,” she said at a campaign rally in Nevada

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/17/kamala-harris-immigration-border-gangs-00173819

But also within context of protecting sex workers.

In one of her first acts as an elected official, Harris sponsored a bill signed into law by Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger that increased penalties for adults who solicited sex from minors and was considered revolutionary for its push to transform children from criminals into victims.

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-09-26/before-combating-sex-trafficking-became-a-republican-tenet-kamala-harris-wrote-the-playbook

Well, I guess since you thanked me for it, the summary is 100% accurate. Good to know, friend!