Reminder that this is a test but it looks promising.

  • rcbrk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    If SAF is 100% cooking oil, the planet has nowhere near enough cooking oil to exclusively supply aviation.

    Waste cooking oil available would be a miniscule fraction of the 213 million tons produced, so any further use or production for biofuels either takes food out of peoples’ bowls and/or destroys ecosystems.

    That said, it could be done in a sustainable way, as suggested by this world economic forum paper. I don’t know enough to criticise the reasoning in that paper. I suspect there could be major negative implications for some solutions for shifting the worlds’ liquid fuel supply to biofuels.

    Sailing ships and global rail networks for the win.

    • CHEF-KOCHOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      I doubt it is natural vegetable oil, more like a mix of waste so your math does not apply here. Your fuel calculation is also based on traditional fuel, not what the topic is about.

      Your papers are useless in this example since this is a test and this is not yet the standard, so no reference can be applied here as because there are no data for such claims.

      There is always a trade-off between things, but we are talking about a substance that is considered waste for most countries, it is still a better solution than what your charts are referring too, the traditional methods.