I think it’s important to understand that Marxist-Leninists should be supporting the people of both countries, rather than picking one of two capitalist states to back. I understand that Russia has its excuses for doing this, and the Ukraine government has its excuses for what it has done, but it’s important to remember that they are both capitalist countries in the age of imperialism; what they are really after is power. Please feel free to correct me if you believe I got anything wrong.

  • RuheForst@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 years ago

    Yes, but I think it’s important to note that Russia is relatively weak compared to the West, so their power spread is not necessarily bad. These are not two equally strong powers wrestling with each other but a strong one trying to dominate the world and Russia is one of the few countries that can still effectively resist. I would therefore support Russia very, very critically because I see the greater evil in the West. But that does not mean that Russia is a remarkably great country and should get full support, they are nonetheless capitalist.

    • KingSpartan15@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      They are capitalist and their enemy is the white hegemonic core. So I think it is rather arrogant to lambaste Russia for societal and civilizational imperfection when it’s entire existence has been developed under genocidal threat from the American Empire

      How can you say the west is the “greater” evil? These phenomenon are not even comparable. Russia is not part of the white hegemonic core.

      To put them on the same scale is misleading and aids liberal ideology.

      The West is THE evil.

      • RuheForst@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        Completely agree with you. I think it’s just important to not mindlessly support Russia in everything they do, they still have some capitalist imperialist interests. That’s critical support. But yeah you’re right

    • guojing
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      You are wrong, but its not surprising considering the nonstop propaganda about power of the u.s. military. Fact is that Russia has hypersonic missiles (10 times speed of sound), with range of 1000+ kilometers. These cant be intercepted in any way, and it seems they dont show up on radar. That means Russia could strike at any NATO base in Europe, or any aircraft carrier, with zero warning time. In military terms, the U.S. is simply powerless in a direct, conventional confrontation against Russia.

      • pinkeston@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Missiles are nothing compared to economic imperialism

        The moment Russia tries to let loose those rockets on an important state, they are getting invaded by a full offensive

        Economic warfare is much more effective than military warfare in the age of MAD, and the West is unparalleled when it comes to that; The gap is so ridiculously large

        • guojing
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yes we can see how effective the sanctions are. Western countries are literally committing economic suicide, while Russia will simply reorient towards Asia.

          • pinkeston@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            You’re only looking at sanctions attempted against Russia and China, 2 very military strong states + vital pieces of the world economy

            Economic imperialism has submitted countries attempted literally everywhere else. Even Japan at its peak fell to the US

            • guojing
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 years ago

              Sanctions havent worked against a single country. Look at Cuba, DPRK, Iran, Venezuela etc.

              • pinkeston@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 years ago

                Sanctions is a small part of imperialism and economic warfare

                Also you can’t say sanctions haven’t greatly crippled all those countries above, because they have

                All would be much greater threats without the sanctions placed on them

      • Edwarder@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 years ago

        The question is, how many of those missiles they managed to produce. Russia’s industrial complex has been on decline since the collapse of the SU.

        • guojing
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Its not the 90s anymore, Russian economy is doing quite well. Also it only takes one or two missiles to sink an aircraft carrier. Think of the psychological effect when it turns out that the u.s. military isnt invulnerable.

        • guojing
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          The u.s. suffered a humiliating defeat in Afghanistan less than a year ago, against guys armed with AKs. Thats what i call weak.