They already have news titled “Russia wins the battle to lose a war” or something. They adapt to anything no problem, it’s their job
Just seen someone on Twitter arguing that losing Mariupol is actually good for them and possibly a tactical loss, because if they’re seen losing in the media that’s going to get them more help.
Maybe they could make the argument that losing Mariupol was a tactical decision if it didn’t cost them 14,088 of their most ideologically committed fighters.
14088
I see what you did there
I would pay money to be in the white house briefing rooms where they’re telling Biden that its already a lost cause.
Nice touch to make “Ongoing” green so that it looks more balanced at a glance 🙄
The russian army is really damn impressive, in comparison to the inconpetent, spoiled, evil and undisciplined US army, the Russian one is basically the oposite.
Amazing what happens when a military is treated as a military rather than as a vehicle for extracting profits.
Siege of Mariupol can be upgraded to Russian Victory
Yeah that true, but I think on this site it’s still not updated
What site is this? Wiki?
With the amount of articles pushing the “might and power” of Ukrainian counterattacks, you would have expected more boxes in gold :)))
Here’s how Ukraine can still win!!! :-)
“they just need to use 20 width divisions!”
Meta changed after the last add-on though
That’s like the spacerace. Individual victories don’t mean total win. To gauge the status of the war only on victories of battles leaves out so much other information like total attrition on gear and hr or area gained.
