Just seen someone on Twitter arguing that losing Mariupol is actually good for them and possibly a tactical loss, because if they’re seen losing in the media that’s going to get them more help.
Maybe they could make the argument that losing Mariupol was a tactical decision if it didn’t cost them 14,088 of their most ideologically committed fighters.
Just seen someone on Twitter arguing that losing Mariupol is actually good for them and possibly a tactical loss, because if they’re seen losing in the media that’s going to get them more help.
Maybe they could make the argument that losing Mariupol was a tactical decision if it didn’t cost them 14,088 of their most ideologically committed fighters.
14088
I see what you did there