sicko-yes hobbes-pounce

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m an English grad. A whole lot of the poetry sections of my upper division courses involved insufferably bleak and pretentious crap (don’t get me started about The Waste Land and the author of it being such a jagoff that he bragged on his deathbed that people still didn’t understand it, as a final flex). I happened to really love Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s poems which made me a bit of a pariah sometimes because he committed heresy such as things rhyming sometimes, or the poem being actually understood by most readers, that sort of thing.

      Rime of the Ancient Mariner fucking slaps. It’s like late 1700s metal. skeleton-motorcycle

      Kubla Khan doesn’t count when it comes to the “easy to understand” thing. The poet was tripping balls while writing it and even he didn’t know what it meant or where it was going.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Well to be fair a lot of historically famous poetry is shit too. Idk maybe they lost a lot in translation, but some don’t i like Iliad and Odyssey for example. I find best historical poetry to be ancient Sumerian-Akkadian (and their epigones), they didn’t give a fuck about million rules just created clear and easy to follow rhytm with repeating.

        To be fair to poetry in general i started to hate it because the Polish romanticist nationalist poetry. There are FUCKTON of it, and they are even worse than all other romanticist poetry because it was the partition time and Poland didn’t exist so you can imagine what those shitty chewed off noble druggie losers could write. Well they are some banger fragments like Mickiewicz apparently predicting socialism as saviour of Poland but mostly its shit but every kid in Poland since WW1 ended was tortured with that for years, and sadly PRL wasn’t an exception.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          but some don’t i like Iliad and Odyssey for example

          I fully accept that; they’re ponderous and repetitive in places, especially in higher fidelity attempts at translation. They were meant to be episodic, in a way, which means chorus recaps and the like.

          I have some scorching hot takes on Shakespeare that got some frothingfash tier ableist slurs and death threats sent my way in the past so I’ll keep those to myself. Even offline while in college, some Bardologists got pissed when I had anything to say but praise about him. There’s a very real “in-group” clique that dominates humanities departments, and “Bardologist” was the watch word among the few, the damned, professors and students alike, that had anything negative to say about him.

          I find best historical poetry to be ancient Sumerian-Akkadian

          Gilgamesh isn’t just legendary because of its age; it’s truly a great story and it hurts how much of it has been lost.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Well i meant i like iliad and Odyssey, Polish translations are very good imo.

            I’m pretty mid on Shakespeare, he’s ok, but my two most liked pieces are actually adaptations and a loose ones at that: Throne of Blood and Titus Andronicus (that with Hopkins). What i find funny about Shakespeare is that where i find quotes form him the most often, is the murican sci-fi slop books, they seem to think he’s the absolute pinnacle of entire human culture.

            Also fun fact, his name is easily translatable into Polish: Wilhelm Trzęsidzida

            • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Well i meant i like iliad and Odyssey, Polish translations are very good imo.

              I misunderstood you, then. My mistake. I’m a big enjoyer of both myself. I even somewhat like the glorified Roman fanfiction of the Odyssey that was the Aneid.

              What i find funny about Shakespeare is that where i find quotes form him the most often, is the murican sci-fi slop books, they seem to think he’s the absolute pinnacle of entire human culture.

              That’s my biggest beef too: lots of knee-jerk “by quoting this ribald pro-Tudor propaganda I am suddenly the largest galaxy of brains” collective hype that somehow bled back into the humanities departments to the point of actively ignoring Shakespeare’s contemporaries (including those he appropriated from). That’s not even going into the libertarian-alert side of things that such departments also try to sweep under the rug if they’re so much as asked about in class.

              I’m not saying Shakespeare had no value or significance for modern English in its nascent development period; far from it. I’m not saying Shakespeare didn’t have great significance in western civilization, which obviously he did. My issue is the knee-jerk uncritical worship even for some plays that were more or less Michael Bay movies of the Renaissance, crude patriotism gestures and pandering fanservice alike (oh and nonce references/humor, also very Bay)

              Wilhelm Trzęsidzida

              Awesome!

              I also know his name translates well from the original Klingon as Wil’yam Sheq’spir.

              • ChestRockwell [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                Michael Bay movies of the Renaissance

                Oh come-on, he was more of a Tarantino. Remixer of other more artistic playwrights to make mass culture.

                Also equally purient and into the lowbrow. Which is part of why he’s notable, he was the first real “pop” culture that was made for all classes, rather than just either aristocracy or peasants/tradesmen (i.e. medieval cycle dramas were for the later, the poetry the former).

                • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Also equally purient and into the lowbrow. Which is part of why he’s notable, he was the first real “pop” culture that was made for all classes, rather than just either aristocracy or peasants/tradesmen (i.e. medieval cycle dramas were for the later, the poetry the former).

                  I do value and appreciate that, though I have strong opinions about how much of Shakespeare’s pandering to the regime that financed his work was taken as some sort of self-evident historical fact in his so-called historical plays. The most notorious example was his portrayal of Richard III, making him a sort of “too strong and too weak” caricature villain (hunchback optional) that downplayed the absolute monster in battle that dueled, and killed, all but the last of the Tudors would-be kings that went out to kill him, one after the other.

          • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            They were meant to be episodic, in a way, which means chorus recaps and the like.

            This reminds me that the few times I’ve seen historians earnestly talk about all the “lost epics” of the expanded Iliad poetic universe have been very funny, because at their bluntest they’re just sort of hemming and hawing around a point that’s basically “so it was all just a big fanfic scene, really, and a lot of it was bad, and it represented a bunch of different contradictory canons, and like every character no one even liked got a spinoff epic about them getting lunch that one time… So really it seems the two books we do have seem to be what were considered the best, and certainly were the most popular of all them which is why any copies survived at all.”

            Like obviously they’d still be really neat to have, but it’s really funny to think about how this big chunk of what’s held up as one of the pillars of western literary culture was just like, the contemporary equivalent of a fanfic scene where everyone involved was just kind of making up their own stories about these mythic characters and some of it was popular enough to get repeated down the line and only two stories were popular enough to still be getting copied many centuries later.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s distressing just how little remains of Sappho’s poetry. She was legendary, even in antiquity, and we have nearly nothing left of her work. desolate

              • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yeah. I still remember learning that when I was in high school and being confused at how there was just so little left of someone I was at the same time being told was so famous and prolific. I think that was one of the formative steps to realizing just how fragmentary even the most famous bits of history really are, because before that point everything I’d seen about antiquity was always presented with a sort of air of completeness and I never realized how often that vague summaries of a place or person or practice genuinely were the sum total of what’s actually known about them.

      • MaoTheLawn [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Did you enjoy The Lighthouse? The killing of the seabird hits extra hard having read the Rime. Hark Triton.

        It’s a different era of poetry altogether, but some proper old English poetry has made me feel wistful in a way that no other poetry really ever has. I recommend The Seafarer if you like Rime. I’d also recommend The Ruin, and The Wanderer. In all cases though I’d recommend contextualising them, and really trying to understand the weight of the things they’re saying… about the hearth, and the halls, and how it relates to Christianity at the time and all that. For some reason it really just hits me in the gut. The Ruin is probably the easiest to ‘get’ without any context.

        I think Tolkien might even have been the author of some of the most popular translations of those texts.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m familiar with most of those, and yes, they have a heavy weight on some readers much like the cold briny seabreeze blowing upon a stranded sailor.

      • ChestRockwell [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Coleridge slaps. Also Kubla Khan mercifly tells you that it’s drug poetry right away, so it’s easy to understand as the “fragment of a dream” or whatever he calls it.

        I like the 17th century lyric poetry (Donne, Marvell, etc) though. Very intricate, but in an accessible way (just follow the complex sentence).

      • Smeagolicious [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        And now the STORM-BLAST came, and he

        Was tyrannous and strong:

        He struck with his o’ertaking wings,

        And chased us south along.

        With sloping masts and dipping prow,

        As who pursued with yell and blow

        Still treads the shadow of his foe,

        And forward bends his head,

        The ship drove fast, loud roared the blast,

        And southward aye we fled.

        As soon as I read “STORM-BLAST” the first time, I knew that shit was metal

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Legit good poem for anyone to have written. If a six-year-old actually wrote this, that amazes me.

  • TerminalEncounter [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    Little kid art is usually so raw and inventive, then something happens around grade 2 and they start sucking. I dunno what it is, I guess they learn what is considered “good” by the hegemonic culture and try representing it? Kids spend the next 10 to 20 years unlearning all that to get back to where they were in kindergarten lol

    • Assian_Candor [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s peer pressure and the desire to conform. Right around age 9 they start developing an ego / sense of self, they become less concerned with doing what they want and more concerned with fitting in. Some kid says “your drawing is a mess you don’t even color inside the lines” and you have gone from a prolific and creative artist to a child that doesn’t draw

      • Smeagolicious [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        I kept drawing/painting/etc throughout my entire life from an early age and I hate that I have to try so hard to convince people that, yes, they can do art too! It’s not about the common value-derived definition of “talent” (the ability to apply and make money from a skill), I love seeing even rough sketches by people that haven’t done so since they were young.

        This formative peer pressure and the overwhelming push to consider the monetary value in everything first has robbed us, humanity, from so much beautiful art. It’s a tragedy what capital has done, to instill this mode of thought in children to last their entire lives…

        • SuperZutsuki [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          As someone that drew and doodled all the time until like 17 what really got in the way of making art was becoming an “adult”, getting a job, and having the life drained from me. School was a place where I always had paper and a pencil in front of me and I rarely had to pay attention to do well in class. I’ve felt like an empty husk for so long. I barely have energy to feed myself and doomscroll after work.

          I also quickly became isolated and alienated after high school. Being without a community of people you love and that love you makes it so difficult to get into that vulnerable state where you can really express yourself. I’m finally starting to find community again after many years of drifting around listlessly. I started taking piano lessons a few years ago and from there got enough of a foundation in music to get over the hump of anxiety about playing with people.

          Recently I stumbled my way into an amazing community of artists, musicians, and performers who have inspired me to create again. I found some friends who are also pretty new to music and we’re putting together a band and having a blast. I painted something for the first time in like 18 years. I’ve been drawing and writing when I can. After so many years that felt barren and devoid of life, this year (really just the past few months) have been so overwhelmingly packed with joy that I’ve been brought to tears multiple times.