as a person that came from the 3rd world country and new in fediverse environment, i genuinely would like to know about this.

edit: thanks for the replies! sorry, i literally don’t know the reason since i’m not a western lol. twitter/x is too biased especially when musk openly supports trump so i came here and seeing fediverse is mostly are harris or biden (when he’s still up for the candidate) supporters. don’t know about reddit tho, i only use reddit as a forum for linux and programming stuff.

  • lady_maria@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    229
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I think a lot of the people on Lemmy came from Reddit when the whole API thing happened. It was pretty much a boycott. I assume most of the people who cared enough about that to leave were mostly left-leaning.

    That’s why I’m here, at least.

    Edit: not sure about Mastodon, though

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Reddit chased away the Trump supporters before the API thing happened. When it did, some people like me who are classic-liberals and libertarians also came over. After all, Lemmy is an inherently libertarian platform even when its users aren’t. When I express a political opinion objectionable to leftists, I get several times more down-votes than up-votes but I do get up-votes.

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Lemmy is an inherently libertarian platform

        This is an interesting perception, because if you mean American libertarianism then this doesn’t really make sense. Lemmy’s creators are communist and intended it to be anti-corporate. It is designed in a decentralized manner specifically to avoid situations where companies can own and profit from it.

        The kinds of platforms I would see as being libertarian (in the American sense) are the diaspora of privately owned social media companies.

          • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            The idea of preventing private ownership and rent-seeking of communication platforms is.

          • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I respect it but if you’re American and trying to take the word back, I’m afraid you’re a little too late. It’s a political party now and they’re all-in on corporatism.

            • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Almost no one pays attention to the big-L Libertarian party. Ron and Rand Paul got some attention on the national level but they weren’t even members of the party (while in office) and the party itself has never been politically relevant.

              I think these days the word is associated more with Silicon Valley techno-libertarians (a group I identify with). These guys favor the free market over government regulation (which isn’t really relevant to Reddit) but they’re also very sympathetic to free-as-in-speech open-source software.

              • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                4 months ago

                Silicon Valley techno-libertarians (a group I identify with)

                I hate to break it to you but these are definitely the worst ones. It’s what the Gadsden flag waving canned food and gun hording preppers turn into if they end up with tons of money. These are the morons that build bunkers in New Zealand and try to brainstorm ways to keep their post-apocalyptic security guards loyal to them with remote-detonated bomb collars or holding their families hostage.

                • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  The preppers are different because they want to be left completely alone. They don’t see any acceptable role for government in their lives. I don’t think they’re being realistic. Freedom isn’t free, as the saying goes.

                  The techno-libertarians are much more engaged with society and do see a role for government, even if that role is small and (at least according to some of them) bizarre by conventional standards. I’m not going to deny that the bunker-building types are involved in the movement. I often don’t agree with the weirder people involved, but I like that techno-libertarians are willing to hear people out and judge their ideas rationally rather than shunning them for being weird.

                  (I think I might have a bunker built if I was rich enough. The expected utility of it is higher than that of, say, a second yacht. Human guards are a dead end. Probably the best thing that can be done if civilization totally collapses and you manage to get inside is blowing up the entrance so that anyone who wants to get to you has to move a thousand tons of rock first. You probably won’t ever get to leave, but it’s better than what would happen if you did.)

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Maybe you should look into why we have those regulations. - an actual libertarian

      • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        If it’s libertarian it’s libertarian socialist. There’s no property or capital on here, posts get boosted by collective voting, not based off your following or account. There’s not even an idea of karma, your account means basically nothing here. A capitalist libertarian social media would be something like nostr or what bluesky is claiming it’ll eventually do where you completely own your account and your following and you can use that social capital as you wish.

      • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think this is an example of where the left-right axis isn’t the most adequate way of viewing things. The Fediverse in general is anti-authoritarian. You can be all the way from a far-left anarchist to a far-right anarcho-capitalist and still be anti-authoritarian, just like both tankies and nazis are authoritarian.

      • Cowbee [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Lemmy is an inherently libertarian platform even when its users aren’t

        The devs are Communists and created Lemmy along Communist lines and principles. Libertarians can also agree with Lemmy’s structure though.

      • LemurEyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        As a libertarian liberal, what communities would you recommend? I’m sad there’s not a more active free speech community on this platform. The reddit one is such a gross conservative circle jerk rn.

        • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I used to call myself a “left libertarian” but to be frank, after learning more I’ve found that “anarchist” fits far better. And there’s a lot of interesting content out there that I enjoy. I’m not sure who all .world has defederated, but the solar punk instance is always great, our mods are great (Midwest social), some people may find them abrasive, but those are people who maybe don’t understand that when you play in someone else’s home, you play by their rules.

          Also: blahaj, beehaw, and even hexbear is usually entertaining, even if I have some disagreements with them.

          The point is, there’s a lot out there, depending on who you’re federating with.

        • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t have anything to suggest on Lemmy. There’s so little activity that I participate in every community where I see an interesting post, except for those communities which are specifically for people with some particular set of beliefs which I don’t share.

          If you’re looking beyond Lemmy, there are are the comment sections of the SlateStarCodex/AstralCodexTen blog and the blogs it links to as well as some associated forums and subreddits. You’ll find plenty of liberal libertarians and the comments tend to be polite and high-effort, but keep in mind that a dedication to free speech means that people with opinions that can’t be discussed elsewhere participate too. It’s a bit much for me sometimes.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    There’s only one way you can support Trump today.

    You either refuse to acknowledge all the terrible things he’s done, or you approve of the things he’s done.

    People who refuse to acknowledge, are going to look at all the “fake news” on this site about His Oranginess, and quickly decide that it’s nothing but propaganda and go somewhere “more reliable”.

    Those who agree, stick around a little longer. They will argue and defend the horrible things, because they think there are more like them that will come out and back them up as a fellow defender of racism misogyny homophobia “Good old family values”. But they will be downvoted to oblivion and have trouble finding a friendly voice. Eventually, they too will go where they can have a more comfortable discussion with people who are as terrible as they are.

    And ironically enough, if you went to Truth Social, and asked why there weren’t more Biden/Harris supporters there, they’d give you the exact same answer in reverse.

    • andrewta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      We had an opportunity years ago to fix this problem. Long before Trump ever showed up on the scenes as a political individual. We needed in schools to be teaching how to pick out real news from fake news. How to pick out fact from propaganda. Hell out to read a newspaper properly.

      How to logically pick a part in argument. We chose not to. We as a society, decided not to put our money towards that. Now people read a headline, and based purely on the headline, make a statement such as “throw the guy in jail for the rest of his life for that one “.

      I sat on a jury trial. It was a murder trial, if you went purely by what was in the local newspaper, you would’ve seriously questioned why the guy didn’t just take a plea deal. If you sat in that courtroom day after day, listening to it you’d realize this is a lot tougher than what you realize. we had a hard time figuring out if the guy was even in town at the time of the murder.

      But for those that weren’t involved in the trial, they’re convinced the guy belonged in jail for the rest of his life. Because people didn’t sit down and really read the newspaper and ask important questions. Because we don’t hold our journalists to a higher standard and force them to give all the information And tell both sides of the story.

      I have no idea how you solve the problem anymore. Because at this point, even if you tell the complete truth about any given politician, no one‘s going to believe what they’re reading anymore because there’s another so-called journalist out there saying the exact opposite and people say well I don’t know what to believe then. And can’t figure out how to critically think about this and ask questions.

      Here in Lemmy we are guilty of the same sort of thing, same as over at truth social same as over at Twitter same as over Facebook.

      As a society, I’m sorry for the language here, we are well and truly fucked.

      I truly don’t know what the answer is.

      Also sidenote 10 bucks says somebody comes back with a stupid comment of well since you don’t know what the answer is obviously you’re just saying that we shouldn’t do anything and just give up.

      • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        If you’ve never watched the movie 12 Angry Men, do yourself a favor and watch it. You are going to love it and it has everything to do with your comment.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Neglecting public education is really going to keep biting us in the ass.

        Something like half of US adults can’t read at a sixth grade level.

        If we took some of the idiotic venture capitalist “it’s cat gifs on the block chain” nonsense and put it into education and infrastructure, we’d be so much better off.

        I don’t really know how to get from here to there, either. Give me magic powers to Thanos snap away some people, maybe?

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have no idea how you solve the problem anymore. Because at this point, even if you tell the complete truth about any given politician, no one‘s going to believe what they’re reading anymore because there’s another so-called journalist out there saying the exact opposite and people say well I don’t know what to believe then. And can’t figure out how to critically think about this and ask questions.

        Reverse cargo cult.

      • barooboodoo (he/him)@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        We needed in schools to be teaching how to pick out real news from fake news.

        Obviously there are issues with education in this country but it’s always an easy scapegoat for these kinds of issues. Plenty of states have skills like this in their common core, I would venture to say you’re incorrect on that point.

        • andrewta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Fair enough I graduated in the early 90s at that time we didn’t have it. At least not at the level that I felt that we should’ve. If I’m wrong on that, then I apologize.

          • barooboodoo (he/him)@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            No worries, you just hear a lot of misguided criticisms of the education system a lot of which are based on anecdotal experiences. I wish everyone would keep tabs on what kids are learning and have a more hands on approach to curricula.

            • andrewta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              So what you are saying is I should be volunteering for the geography classes to help reinforce the flat earth ideals? 😁

              • aalvare2@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Oh fucking christ, a flat-earther. You people are even worse than the fucking round-earther scum on this platform.

                I swear you people will never accept a velociraptor-shaped earth, prolly cuz your brains just aren’t big enough to process the geometry.

                Edit: I really hoped the /s would not be necessary…

    • Orbituary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You either refuse to acknowledge all the terrible things he’s done, or you approve of the things he’s done.

      This is two ways. You literally said either / or.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Reddit’s early days were also far more left leaning then they eventually became.

    When you have a small niche of nerds who enjoy discussing topics and ideas, then far right wing points will get downvoted to hell because they are, quite frankly, dumb, divorced from logic and the real world, and don’t stand up to actual critical scrutiny.

    Reddit got more right leaning as it grew and expanded into the general population and more dummies started upvoting dumb posts, then got more right leaning when right wing political orgs took notice and started trying to influence it, and now seems even more right leaning because they’ve changed their algorithms to prioritize controversial comments and posts that get people angry because it boosts engagement.

    • Ghostface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 months ago

      While very true, dont discount apathy and lurking. I may have made 15-20 comments on reddit for tge 10+ yrs I was on the platform. There were so many ppl 1. That typically someone else would respond. Two reddit descended into ppl who just want to argue semantics. Here without the karma farming people have more genuine responses

      Over on mastodon on the other hand… I get the feeling people brought some of the negative aspects of twitter over there. Still overwhelmingly positive but I tend to get more info on lemmy now than mastodon Imo

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I don’t think there’s any less karma farming on here. People still look at their up and downvotes, and I don’t think there was a legitimate industry for selling high karma accounts on Reddit. Not one that would make a difference at scale anyways.

        The problem with Mastodon and Twitter is structural, it’s based around following people, not topics. It is inherently problematic because a) personalities and status get elevated over the logic of the argument, b) following people instead of topics inherently feeds people’s egos in a problematic way, and c) a given person can use their followers problematically (brigading, etc). On Reddit / Lemmy by following decentralized topics it eliminates or reduces most of these effects, though the mods controlling each subreddit can exercise some of the same influence.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          The problem with Mastodon and Twitter is structural, it’s based around following people, not topics.

          I’ve long thought this but infrequently find other people who think the same!

          On here (and reddit, rip) and most forums, I don’t really look at the user name. I just read the content I think that’s a better setup.

        • solrize@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          People still look at their up and downvotes

          You can turn that off in the UI. I did that and it mostly makes the place more tolerable, though I do find myself peeking sometimes.

    • Archer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Early Reddit was very libertarian, you would not believe how big Ron Paul was. It went more to the left once it got a mainstream audience

    • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah. It’s the advantage but also disadvantage of the Fediverse. If you’re on the wrong instance you won’t even notice that certain ideologies are right out blocked by the instance owner. This can go into all political directions. You wouldn’t even notice this happening unless you do research on which instances are blocked by yours.

      • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Personally I’m cool with that. I don’t think daily exposure to actual fascists is good for one’s head. And I wouldn’t mind .ml getting the axe too (though I’m not gonna be the one pestering my instance admin about that) because Tankies are equally as draining.

      • mbp@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s the thing. On one hand I like not being bombarded by the shit opinions but on the other I like being informed at what the talking points are (to a degree) because I find that keeps me sharp against the opposition. When I read or hear about conservative viewpoints, I only think about how obtuse the logic is so it’s not something I worry at all about affecting my mindspace so this might not be a solution to everyone.

        I’m still torn on the topic since it’s nice to not give a platform to obviously shit ideals since that’s how the misinformation spreads but I still wonder if there’s an even better protocol out there we haven’t been able to even comprehend yet.

  • dan00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Without echo chambers, the weak trump supporter gets bullied and humiliated, leaving defeated and confused back to his herd. Nature is beautiful. “

    David Attenborough, maybe

      • LemurEyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s insane. I left reddit because I thought it was an over-moderated echo chamber with too much corporate influence. Lemmy is somehow an even worse echo chamber and it didn’t need corporate influence to see it happen.

        • Cowbee [he/they]
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Picking Lemmy over Reddit is a political choice, hence Lemmy having far more Communists.

  • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    They’re here, anything pro trump is often downvoted, and most things heavily critical of the Dems are also often downvoted.

    For better or worse, there’s not a lot of right wing stuff that makes it into the positive on votes.

    If you sort new, you’ll see it pop up from time to time.

    It’s hard to tell sometimes, but it certainly feels like some political regimes are trying out dropping propaganda here or there into the conversation. I’m sure most of it is from genuine users, but there are some comments that just look like they’re here to stir up dissent.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      For better or worse, there’s not a lot of right wing stuff that makes it into the positive on votes.

      That is for the better.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        4 months ago

        You occasionally run into some disagreeable but unobjectionable “traditional” conservative opinions, usually around economics and the governments role in it, but trump shit isn’t that. We can be friends if you think a market solution is viable or better than an entitlement program. We can’t be friends if you think a significant portion of your fellow citizens are vermin or that we should just let terrible problems continue or get worse.

        The window has just shifted so far that literal objective depictions of reality are described as “left”.

      • hypna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        It would be nice to have some opposition, though. Even if most “conservative” media right now is little more than xenophobia, or cult worship, there do exist sound arguments against the typical internet-left positions. I don’t have a solid enough read on what comes through New in the fediverse to say whether any of that is being submitted and just downvoted off everyone’s feeds, or if all that’s being submitted is the average conservative media junk.

        Still, political spaces without opposition/diversity invariably degenerate into purity contests, and circle jerking.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          No, there’s really not sound arguments against them. That’s why nobody ever hears sound arguments.

          Stop assuming ghosts exist because you saw a picture frame on the wall move when a large truck went by…

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            No, there’s really not sound arguments against them.

            That’s like saying there are no trade-offs to any policies; it’s simply not true. I’m as left as they come (not American left, British), but failing to admit there are flaws or sound arguments against left-wing ideas is very ignorant.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Nonono, you misunderstand the political landscape.

              Something having downsides IS NOT the same as the claims being made against things. If you think conservative politicians are arguing in good faith, you simply haven’t been listening.

              There really are not sound (conservative) arguments against them.

              If you do not agree, you do not know enough. Period.

              • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                If you do not agree, you do not know enough. Period.

                Lol. Your arrogance is astounding.

                • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Your pride in ignorance is pathetic. Perfect example of why public education is critically important to fund, and to fund properly.

                  Conservstives cling on to old, stupid ideas that are in the process of being proven wrong. Again and again and again and again.

                  But you go ahead and defend that hill that brought us golden gems of wisdom like “Trickle Down Economics”, private, for-profit prisons, and a lack of regulation so companies can dump what ever they want in to rivers and the ocean…

              • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Not what I said, is it? The person said there are no arguments against “the typical internet-left positions”; which I disagree with. If such positions were infallible, they would always succeed. All policies have trade-offs.

                I didn’t mention “right … sound points” or their representation.

        • Sunforged
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Conservative media comes through plenty in the form of business, tech and mainstream media sources 🙄

          Don’t confuse the fact that Republicans have become degenerate doesn’t mean their ideas are the basis of conservative ideology.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The difference to Reddit et al is that votes don’t generally matter a huge lot in here. And you can easily hide them.

    • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      However Lots of places love to call those pointing out flaws in democratic policies trump supporters unfortunately

  • Antiproton@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    4 months ago

    There are plenty of Trump supporters here. Every comment from someone who implies one shouldn’t vote for Harris because of the Israel-Gaza war is likely someone trying to suppress Democrat turnout. Single issue voting is the only way the GOP ever win.

    • OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      The Gaza posts always make me laugh because they completely ignore that Trump would just glass Gaza.

      The only reason Trump hasn’t showed how terrible he’d be on Gaza is because he isn’t president right now.

          • Skeezix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Have you stopped to consider that labelling someone as the “enemy” is parlance mostly engaged in by conservatives? Progressives don’t usually think in those terms. To a progressive, you might be ignorant, misinformed, misguided, deluded, xenophobic, racist, or engaging in bad faith, but you are rarely the “enemy.” Even Trump himself although perhaps though of as an “enemy of democracy,” is not a personal enemy. Your response using that metaphor serves to highlight the conservative mind set of making it personal, and harboring an anger so deep that political disagreement is grounds for personal animosity and even violence.

            • Bgugi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              4 months ago

              I like how you’re so high up on your horse that not only does is your team too good to have enemies, you can doublethink away any use of the term as impersonal.

              • Communist_Synthesizer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                The US had a 2x mortality rate of Canada. 6x higher compared to South Korea, 10x of Japan the first two years of Covid. Even going with the lowest number, about 500,000 Americans could have survived with even marginally competent leadership. One that might not have…

                1. Disbanded the Pandemic response team Obama set up.
                2. Undercut the messaging from the CDC because Trump couldn’t handle Fauci having a higher approval rating than him.
                3. Spewed constant misinformation about everything from bleach, sunlight to ivermectin while professionals were desperately trying to do their job.
                4. Intentionally dragging his feet on the relief effort because someone told him that it was hitting the cities first and the Democrats would be most affected.
                5. Goddamn masks. All he had to do was go on TV and tell his little cultists to wear the damn things, and we could have prevented so much of the deaths that came from the original strain/Delta. (Not Omicron)

                … Hitler killed less Americans than Trump did. That’s just facts.

                • Bgugi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  The “disbanding” of the pandemic response team is largely misrepresented. I don’t disagree with the rest, or see how it’s at all relevant to the current conversation.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      4 months ago

      You: “Hitler can’t take back office, but we do need to continue the concentration camps. People who don’t want concentration camps are directly supporting Hitler.”

    • ComradeSharkfucker
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      69
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      My brother in christ you cannot compromise on fucking genocide. Liberals like you are so fucking scared of the orange man that you are willing to let hundreds of thousands die without even asking for better.

      • _core@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        If all you’re voting on is how they respond to Gaza, Harris isn’t great but Trump is exponentially worse. He’s openly said that Israel should continue what they’re doing. In fact, in every metric of comparison Trump is exponentially worse. It’s not that we’re scared of Trump, it’s that he is so much worse in every regard.

        • ComradeSharkfucker
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          50
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah no shit but im not gonna settle for genocide. Slower genocide is still genocide and if I can do anything to prevent the murder of hundreds of thousands of people I will do so. I genuinely believe that witholding my vote and protesting has a chance of altering Harris’ position here.

          • Vent@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            What good does altering Harris’s position do if she doesn’t win?

            • ComradeSharkfucker
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              28
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              If she wins without ceasing material support for actual genocide then we have failed as a people. Politicans are beholden to us not the other way around. It is our demands they should listen to not the demands of raytheon, boeing, palantir, and others that uphold their wealth and power.

              Thats not even mentioning the fact that not supporting genocide basically guarantees her win. This is an incredible popular position that many many people passionately care about. She supports genocide because she wants to

              • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                But what good is punishing Harris by withdrawing your vote? What does this even do except inch everything closer to Trump - who will make the issue you’re prioritizing, worse?

                • ComradeSharkfucker
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  It tells her that she might fucking lose if she doesn’t change her stance. Do you really think a politician will do anything for the people if they can win without doing it? How do you think politics works? Asking nicely? I’m exerting political pressure not “punishing her”

        • ComradeSharkfucker
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, of course. I would never encourage people to vote for a fascist

            • ComradeSharkfucker
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Harris is materially supporting a genocide and uncritically parroting the rhetoric of israeli fascist. I am telling people not to vote for her because she too is a fascist. Should she stop supporting this slaughter then I would happily encourage everyone to vote for her

              • medgremlin@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                America is, unfortunately, a two party system. If not enough people vote for Harris, Trump wins. Period. There are no options besides Harris and Trump, and only one of them has talked about how Israel should literally nuke Gaza (I’ll let you take a guess on which one it was.)

                I see your idealism, and I agree that any amount of genocide is unacceptable, but letting Trump win will just accelerate the genocide in Gaza, expand it to the West Bank (more noticeably, anyways), and likely start new genocides here in America. I’ve been writing to my representatives and sending them articles about the atrocities being committed by the IDF and imploring them to do something about it…but I’m not dumb enough to withhold my vote from the Centrists and allow the Fascists to take over.

                I repeat: withholding your vote from Harris is effectively a vote for Trump because America is a two party system, and there’s only two options to pick from.

                • ComradeSharkfucker
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  I’ll withhold my vote from trump then I guess. Fascism isn’t something you can vote away, its roots are entirely systemic and the Democrats have no desire to do away with it anyway. People being scared of fascism is basically their best argument for getting elected these days. It’s very useful for them.

                  Besides, what incentive do the Democrats have to change their policy if they won’t lose a single voter. I’m not so naive that I believe politicians in either party determine policy based off morality.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ah yes everyone not happy about genocide is a trump supporter /s

            • ComradeSharkfucker
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              Whichever candidate is willing to end the genocide not that I’d believe trump if he said he would. I’ll vote third party if necessary

              • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                Harris is working to end the genocide right now. She’s fighting for a permanent ceasefire and two state solution. That might not be your preferred way to resolve the conflict, but it would stop the carnage and give Palestine more leverage to negotiate on the world stage.

                • ???@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Yeah… no. If she was working towards that she would have ended all weapon supplies to Israel. What she is doing is putting on a face and pretending to care.

          • ???@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            The Americans are lost. Their version of democracy has collapsed over their own heads. In a way, they deserve this shit. If they put all this crappy energy into unitedly voting for third candidate, it just might work. But nope, gotta wake up every day and go online to accuse people who refuse a second holocaust of being tRuMp SupPorTers.

            Free thought is dead in America and the Americans killed it.

            Go ahead downvote me to fucking hell, haters.

      • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s so hard to take people seriously who talk like turbo redditors. My BrOtHeR iN lOw KeY cHrIsT.

        • ComradeSharkfucker
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          4 months ago

          Thats fair but it’s probably just a generational or regional divide. For instance, I personally can’t take people who use that form of text capitalization seriously. No shame though I just associate it with 7th grade

          • WldFyre@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I just associate it with 7th grade

            You’re not gonna believe this, but I’m pretty sure that was the intent, to mock you

      • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Somehow people think that pointing out that anyone who isn’t Trump are pro-genocide means that Trump somehow isn’t pro-genocide.

        Like you’re not allowed to think about two problems at once. Or that there are no other options…

        • ComradeSharkfucker
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I get that but I’m not gonna criticize trump for being pro-genocide bc we can’t do shit fuck about that. Atleast with Harris there is a slim chance of changing her position on the matter by witholding votes and being vocal about it. Stop doing genocide has gotta be the most reasonable political demand to exist right?

          • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yes. Exactly! The reason people keep removed about Harris and genocide is because they hope something might actually happen about it.

            Biden was an absolutely terrible candidate (that I was going to vote for) and probably the only person who could lose against Trump. Because people constantly removeded about how bad he was they changed the candidate.

            Harris doesn’t get to use Trump as a not-as-bad-as screen, and given that we don’t have the option of not voting for her, everyone should be applying every other available form of pressure to discourage her from enabling genocide or otherwise maintaining the status quo.

            • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              Now is not the time. After she is elected, get out there and put the pressure on her. But it makes no sense to risk the fate of the entire country on this.

              • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                This will come as an absolute shock to you. You can vote for someone you criticize…

                Which party was it that dogpiles on anyone that dares criticize their shitty candidates again?

                The point of saying it before the election is that the expectations are set.

                • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I can understand that you can vote for someone you criticize. But it’s obviously implied that you’re withholding your vote unless the administration changes their tune, which means you’re not voting for someone you’re criticizing at the moment. If not, then you have nothing to pressure with.

                  I am all for constructive criticism but I still don’t think this is an effective means to accomplish getting this point across.

              • ???@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                What kind of democracy is one where you can’t even criticize the candidate because “it’s not the right time” right before the elections when the candidates are forced to make changes to make the public happy? After they are in power, it’s another 4 years of BS, and by the third year the same cycle begins and you are not allowed to criticize your candidate.

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I like it this way. It’s not an “echo chamber” because we do have some interesting liberal vs leftist discussions. I think I’ve already heard quite enough conservative nonsense though; they aren’t entitled to my consideration forever.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    They absolutely exist. But in general, I think most people here are informed and choose a wide variety of information to consume. That is exactly the opposite of most Trump supporters.

  • krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 months ago

    Decentralized network designed to stand up to big tech by gay trans furries. Not much appeal for those folks round these parts.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      yes I think the bigger problem here is right wing propagandists masquerading as lefties.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        My honest interpretation is that there are actually very few right wing propagandists masquerading as lefties, but they are very effective at bringing hapless idiot lefties to their narrative.

        • nyctre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Look, one of the more active ones. Tell us again how Cuba is a great example of communism working as intended.

          • Cowbee [he/they]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Why do you believe that it isn’t? Under what pretext does my being a Marxist make me right-wing?

            • nyctre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Oh, I’m not restarting this conversation with you. You’ve showed your colors when you told me that an article that explains my stance wasn’t an explanation of my stance. Only reason you and others like you sre not blocked is because I get a chuckle out of seeing your nonsense, plus I like to help pointing it out for others that might not know it’s nonsense.

              • Cowbee [he/they]
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                I asked you what your definition of poverty was, and you shared an article with no reference to definition, only to rate of poverty. I wanted to know how you were defining poverty, as we can track metrics over time and analyze external factors. You were uninterested.

                You threw a fit and logged off.

                • nyctre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Ok, I’ll spell it out for you, maybe you’re just that dense. This is a quote from the link, right below the title. The literal subtitle of the article: “seven out of 10 Cubans have stopped eating breakfast, lunch, or dinner due to lack of money or shortages”.

                  If that’s not an explanation, then I’m sorry, maybe we have different definitions for the word. So there you go. My definition of poverty in this case is people not having food to eat.

                  Again, this was at the top of the article, which you’d have seen if you were interested, which you’re obviously not. As we’ve already established, only pretending to be a “lefty”

    • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Careful with that troll word, there are mods that will ban you for saying it. They tell you to report trolls to them, so I did (a very obvious troll) and I got banned. Pretty neat you can’t appeal, and you can’t find out which mod did it either.

  • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    There are a couple masquerading as Green Party supporters, and you do see blatently pro-Trump posters occasionally, but most of them are lurkers who, if they comment, hide behind criticizing Democrats rather than voicing pro-Trump sentiments.

    Look for the people who were smashing Biden for the debate behavior while ignoring Trump’s Alzheimer’s symptoms. The people being nitpicking Harris or Walz, while being silent about the Couch-Fucker and Orange Stalin. Those are the pro-Trump lurkers. There aren’t many, though, because they don’t thrive outside of an echo chamber.

    Lemmy’s an echo chamber as well, but you’ll find plenty of people who criticize both parties, and while a lot of people like Kamala, very few claim she’s perfect, or worship her. And there’s plenty of legitimate criticism of the Democratic party, and strong sentiment about a need for change in US politics. This is the sort of discussion and debate which would not be sanctioned in most conservative forums, and could easily get you banned. So I think it’s fair to say Lemmy is far less echo-y than most.

    • slickgoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think that your metrics for picking covert Trumpers based upon that appaling debate is incorrect and simplistic. I watched every second of that shit show and believed that we were doomed for another 4 years of the orange turd.

      Trump lied during the debate. Some estimates were that he lied upwards of 250 times in his 45 minutes at the mic. Those numbers seems off, but who knows? I don’t know the true figure, but it was insane. However, it is also not the fucking point. Trump is a serial liar. He lies to his family, he lies to the people, he lies to the courts, he lies non-stop. He would have lied if Biden performed outstandingly in the debate. He would have lied if Biden put in a middling performance. And, he lied when Biden performed badly. Are we supposed to be clutching our pearls in shock that Trump lied?

      So, we can’t judge Biden’s terrible performance by the ‘other guy’. We need to judge whether Biden could win in November. And if you had of watched all 90 minutes, like I did, there was zero confidence that he could. The GOP campaign would have portrayed Biden’s lost moments a million times, over and over and over again. And they’d be stupid not to. And yes, Trump lied in the debate. Let’s try and turn the broken bus around on the seemingly new information that a serial liar lied on stage.

      The proof of this was the instant jump in the polls once Harris became the candidate and the growing support since. Is the argument that all these covert GOP critics suddenly turned Dems? Or, perhaps, changing to Haris was the sensible thing to do, and perhaps, just might keep the orange turd out of the white house.

      • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think that your metrics for picking covert Trumpers based upon that appaling debate is incorrect and simplistic.

        Well, yeah, it’s simplistic. I’m generalizing.

        I watched every second of that shit show and believed that we were doomed for another 4 years of the orange turd.

        I agree. Biden had a bad night (and, it appears in retrospect, had been declining for a while). Trump has been a deranged narcissistic sociopath since day 1; Biden was held to a higher standard than Trump. Biden performs poorly, and the heart sunk out of the Democratic faithful. Trump performs poorly, and that’s just par for the course, because all Trumpers care about is hurting liberals.

        However, I admit I don’t know what you’re arguing; I think we agree on most of this. The Harris bump was because (as I said) it gave liberals hope that they could win. The bump came from undecideds who suddenly saw an energized, engaged, and competent viable candidate as an option; or people who before saw only two decrepit old white men (The Patriarchy) feebly flailing for control, and suddenly one of the candidates was strong, under 60, female, and a minority!

        We’re answering OP’s question why there aren’t more Trumpers on Lemmy. There are; they’re just hidden, and how they respond to the debate outs them. The debate was just an example:

        1. Non-Trumper: If Joe had a cold, it looks like a staffer gave him Nyquil instead of amphetamines. He’d have paid for the uppers the next day, but it if ever there was a time to push yourself and pay the price later, this debate was it. He was horrible. Trump was his usual lying self, rambling nonsense, and looked like his usual re-animated corpse.
        2. Trumper: Biden was awful; he’s obviously going senile, unable to answer questions, losing his train of thought, weak.

        Democrats are far more critical of their own candidate than Republicans are of their’s, and that’s how you identify the conservative lurkers. They’re there, and they’re not hard to recognize.

        • slickgoat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          This subsequent post of yours is more substantial in explaining your position and I generally agree with all of your points.

          My post was with the absurdist position that critiquing the Biden performance around the time of the last debate made you an enemy of progressive politics. Joe had fired his last good shot in 2016. He’s a good man, a heroic fighter for his age but Trump was always going to steamroll him this time. It doesn’t matter that Joe had a cold, or that he sometimes made excellent policy points, the optics were that he was meandering and frail. It wasn’t that the debate done him in by itself - Obama sometimes had a bad debate (particularly his first one) it was that his performance on the night confirmed what was evident for months. By the time Joe started arguing with Trump about who could beat who in golf the jig was up.

          Despite Trump’s own senior moments, despite his atrocious behaviour, despite his obvious lies, the feeling was Joe is doomed. And so was the most important election since last time, and that says a lot. The fact that it is not impossible that he still won’t get in again is beyond worrying. But with Harris there is a decent chance.

          I hope that clears up my position? It was more a vent against all those who insisted that we ride the Joe bus over the cliff and disbelieve our own eyes while we did it.

          • Yeah, I think we’re on the same page. The Biden administration did good, but we’d come to a depressingly low point in politics.

            I’m encouraged that more conservatives are feeling it’s safe to pop their heads out and criticize Trump, and the radical right who’ve been able to hijack the party thanks largely to party policies started during Ronald Fucking Regan’s administration. But if they do it on Lemmy, they’re assumed to be liberals which may increase the perception of there being few conservatives on Lemmy.

            Lemmy is still more generally politically Left than American Left, which is, after all, pretty centrist compared to western Europe. This feeds even more into OP’s question about why there aren’t more conservatives on Lemmy: if you look at Lemmy as a European, the pro- Trumpers are neo-Nazis, not conservatives; the center is so far right, anything more right is essentially legally banned in Germany.

            • slickgoat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Thats a pretty sophisticated bit of analysis, particularly for Lemmy.

              I still find it amazing that the vote will be as close as it undoubtedly will become. I mean, Trump is not only for himself, but he is also plainly destructive. He’s now touting the low-information ‘Joe Rogan vote’. Young white guys who haven’t been following anything.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh ffs, it’s non-binary. I can support certain policies while standing 10 down against others. I can look for alternative candidates without being Nazi, shill or troll. I’m fact, that mentality is from the GW Bush playbook, “if you’re not for us, you’re against us!” Which to be fair, I’m against politicians who rake in corporate, PAC and billionaire dollars, mainly because they’re proud corporate and against we regular people.

      • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        But isn’t that exactly what they were saying? If you go on X, for example, you can literally be banned for using the word “cisgender”. Musk considers it a slur. Here, you can voice any opinion.

        However there’s a different between agreeing with some right-wing policies and being a full-on MAGA fascist. Full-on MAGA fascists shrivel up and die when exposed to any discourse that hasn’t been heavily censored and editorialized in their favor. So naturally they’ll avoid places where different opinions are shared. This alone is enough reason to call this place an echo chamber, because a (sadly) very prevalent set of opinions isn’t represented here.

        And I can, for example, get away with referring to MAGA fascists as MAGA fascists knowing full well that not a single one of those Trump-fellating pussies will say anything against me for it, and even if one does, the community will not have their back.

    • ComradeSharkfucker
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      No these people are definitely leftist. Why would we criticize trump when we know there is no chance of altering his policy. Atleast with the democrats we might (and thats a big maybe) push them left by witholding our vote and being vocal about our opposition to genocide