• ree
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    Apple and windows have administrative access to all device right?

    Coulnd’t they juste brick 99% of Russia PCs over night if they wanted?

    • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Not sure if they could brick. But it’s possible for them to render the OS installation unusable.

      The problem is this: what kind of message does it send to their international market? Not a good one I suppose.

      • AgreeableLandscapeM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        A small part of me wants that to happen, just to really hammer in the fact that open source is the only reliable way to run your tech fleet. Especially if the US hates you.

        • bc3114
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Even open source is not 100% safe. I mean the other day I was checking out CMake licensing(because I was bored), and I was shocked to find that you can’t use CMake if US hates you. In what universe would such a tool threaten national security?? It’s just stupid

          • AgreeableLandscapeM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            I mean the other day I was checking out CMake licensing(because I was bored), and I was shocked to find that you can’t use CMake if US hates you. In what universe would such a tool threaten national security??

            Then it’s not open source. Not by the definition.

            Both the Open Source Initiative and the Free Software Foundation agree that you cannot put restrictions on what the software can be used for and still call it Open Source or Free/Libre Software, respectively. Not even conditions like no commercial use or no military use are allowed. This is why CC-BY-SA (do whatever you want as long as you cite the creator and re-license under the same or compatible license) is considered an Open Source/Libre license, but both CC-BY-NC-SA (no commercial use) and CC-BY-ND-SA (no derivative works) are not.

            • bc3114
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              Thanks for the detailed explanation!

              edit: also I’m just sad that a tool I used to trust and love is not really open source as I thought it was:(

    • AgreeableLandscapeM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      I mean, they’re not supposed to be able to per the TOS. Not saying they actually can’t though.