• alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Interesting that this map does have Palestine (presumably the West Bank and east Jerusalem) but doesn’t consider Gaza part of Palestine.

    That’s quite a unique combination.

    Edit: looking at Azerbaijan, I think they just focus on the biggest landmass and ignore exclaves.

    Edit2: the fine print actually says that they ignore exclaves, except for Malaysia.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Maybe it’s just considering de facto control? Israel currently controls the whole Egypt-Palestine border, so there’s no land controlled by any form of Palestinian government that has a border with Egypt

      Edit: or it’s an artifact of the “exclaves have otherwise been ignored” part, if the West Bank is considered the core and Gaza is an exclave of that

  • DrinkMonkey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    Like all maps, this one needs a date. For example, Canada and Denmark now share a land border (Hans island)

  • ramchak@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    Bolivia shares a border with Argentina. They got that wrong on this map.

  • Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Exclaves have been ignored :(

    I was looking for the French-Brazilian border, or the Spain-UK one.

  • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    San Marino, Vatican City, Liechtenstein, Andorra, Mongolia, Nepal, Bhutan, Palestine and Lesotho all have in common being landlocked countries with one or two bigger countries surrounding them. If I’m not mistaken, all of them have somewhat differing political systems to the countries surrounding them.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    It made me think about that “maps only need 4 colors” (I don’t remember the proper name, but it’s an idea that maps with political borders can paint every state/country/whatever using 4 different colors and you’ll never get the same color bordering another), seems like the perfect opportunity to see if it applies here

    • Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s the Four Color Theorem.

      And well, it’s actually mathematically proven, but not for maps with disjointed regions that need to be colored the same, such as Alaska + mainland USA.
      (In that particular case, it’s not too difficult to resolve, but you don’t get a guarantee for it.)

      The map in the post actually merges such disjointed regions, though, so it absolutely should work there.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Here’s a way to do it https://i.imgur.com/YULx0sg.jpeg

      East Africa and the Balkans took a little bit of figuring out

      Edit: and sure enough, there’s actually a mistake in East Africa. DR Congo and Tanzania shouldn’t be the same colour. I think it can be fixed with the following changes:

      • Eritrea, Somaliland, and Kenya > green
      • Djibouti and Somalia > blue
      • Ethiopia > red
      • Tanzania > cyan
      • Zambia > blue
      • Mozambique > red
      • Malawi and Eswatini > green
  • loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s funny looking at the islands, because if you look at the Caribbeans, especially Cuba, they’re close to the nearest continental country, so you might assume at first that they made it work that way for all Islands, and then as you keep going around it keeps getting worst until you have Japan next to Lithuania.

  • hitwright@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s facinating to see, that only Lichtenstein seems to have to cross 2 countries to reach the ocean for trading.

  • maegul (he/they)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s actually quite cool. Its nice how the world’s geography is reflected in the broad structure of the map (as it’s have to be I presume).

    • Malgas@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not even land borders. It’s missing France-Brazil, UK-Spain, and France-Netherlands at the very least.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      That would be the blue line. A bit confusing with an identically blue background.