• a_Ha
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      great contribution, thanks again
      2022-03-02 01:01
      Foreign Minister Wang Yi stressed that China has always believed that the security of one country should not be achieved at the expense of the security of other countries, and that regional security can not be achieved by expanding military blocs. (…)
      Wang Yi stated China’s position with a focus on ensuring the safety of Chinese citizens in Ukraine and …

  • a_Ha
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    2022.03.01
    China has played a constructive role in the Ukraine issue, and the Ukrainian side is willing to strengthen communication with China and looks forward to China’s good offices to realize the ceasefire. Wang Yi said that the situation in Ukraine has changed rapidly, and China deplores the outbreak of conflict between Ukraine and Russia, and is extremely concerned about the harm to civilians. China’s basic position on the Ukraine issue is open, transparent and consistent.

    search

    Gov.cn : The Chinese Central Government’s Official Web Portal
    乌克兰 site:gov.cn
    http://new.fmprc.gov.cn/web/wjbzhd/202203/t20220301_10646886.shtml

    mandarin Chinese simplified

    中方在乌克兰问题上发挥了建设性作用,乌方愿同中方加强沟通,期待中方为实现停火开展斡旋。 王毅表示,乌克兰局势急剧变化,中方对乌俄爆发冲突感到痛惜,对平民受到伤害极为关注。中方在乌克兰问题上的基本立场是公开、透明和一贯的。

    français

    La Chine a joué un rôle constructif dans la question ukrainienne, et la partie ukrainienne est disposée à renforcer la communication avec la Chine et attend avec impatience les bons offices de la Chine pour réaliser le cessez-le-feu. Wang Yi a déclaré que la situation en Ukraine avait changé rapidement et que la Chine déplorait le déclenchement du conflit entre l’Ukraine et la Russie et était extrêmement préoccupée par les dommages causés aux civils. La position de base de la Chine sur la question ukrainienne est ouverte, transparente et cohérente.

  • guojing
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 years ago

    They want a ceasefire only to have time for shipping more weapons into Odessa and other cities. Russia should ignore this and demand a surrender.

    • Julianus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Russia is the one on the clock. Their demands only get weaker as sanctions strangle their economy and more high-tech weapons flow into Ukraine. It’s clear their timeline of the invasion has been greatly frustrated. “Over by Christmas” they always say.

      • guojing
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 years ago

        Hahahaha. The only ones who are destroying their economy with the sanctions are Europeans. Russia will keep trading with China, India, and most of the world really. Western countries dont matter that much anymore.

          • guojing
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 years ago

            How much electricity in your country is produced from gas?

            • Julianus
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 years ago

              That number should be zero, unless it’s carbon is directly captured.

      • guojing
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        First of all, it doesnt matter which side you or I want to win. And you seem to be under the impression that the war started last week, which is wrong. The war started in 2014, after the u.s. coup in kiev. Lugansk and Donetsk didnt accept that illegal change of government, and were attacked with tanks. Russia has since then demanded u.s. and nato to stand out of ukraine, but were ignored. Ukraine was about to start another offensive on Donbass, and threatened to acquire nuclear weapons (they still have know-how from soviet times).

        In general you seem to make a lot of assumptions about me, but know very little about the conflict itself.

          • guojing
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            Because that was the only way to avoid war.

              • guojing
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 years ago

                Is your knowledge of history really so limited that the only comparison you know is hitler? Crimea did vote for joining Russia, and Donbass republics would vote the same way. But obviously weateen propaganda would never acknowledge that.