• jack@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Yup, the other side is pretty counterproductive with saying the project is dehumanizing etc. They’re absurdly exaggerating.

    It wasn’t just a report tho, it’s a PR that could’ve been merged with a single click

    • Nima@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      I hope this guy has himself a nice whiskey and a break. and I hope the commenters find some other fixation soon.

    • Axusse
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree with that, I read the comments and I agree about exaggeration. At the same time it is not something political to just adjust the documentation to use gender neutral terms as it is a professional thing to do. Where would be the place to discuss it considering that the only way to modify the code is from GitHub and PR?