• toastal
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    All the Matrix clients are buggy using far too many resources & the protocol is slow as balls about joining new rooms while being wasteful about data duplication for throwaway bits of text/multimedia. I don’t think eventual consistency is the right model for chat & following Slack & Discord’s model is the way.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Slack & Discord both use eventual consistency?

      Btw I agree with you that Discord is better UX than Matrix, but your comment doesn’t make much sense

      • toastal
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Sorry for clarity. The eventual consistency model is a result of wanting decentralization for Slack/Telegram/Discord’s design of thinking the entire history needs to be saved for chat rather than seen as ephemeral (which allows for better search & resilience, but at a major cost to storage, but also a knock-on effect of folks treating chat as permanent which is why we have huge, cut-off information silos on these chat platforms that the rest of the net can’t index & often trawling the search is difficult so the repeated questions/answers are common since a simple web search doesn’t yield good results). When you take away the concept that all text & attachments need to be seen from origin til the end of time, you would never bother in all the work of cloning the entire history & reassembling it on every server listening to the conversation. …Which is why many chat protocols forgo the more then enough history to keep you up to speed with a conversation & structured forums + feeds used to be the primary way to ask questions & make announcements (where simple programs could parse the data instead of needing gobs of natural language processing for chat soup when it is pulling multiple duties).