• dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Shit, y’all could’ve saved a ton of time and effort if you’d have just asked me; I’ve been saying this for years. And it’s only worse when you’re the one speck of blue in a red sea.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s one of those things that are obvious to reasonable people but it’s nice to have proof for when you run into unreasonable people who deny it.

    • _number8_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      i love getting scolded about voting when even if I personally managed to pull off a miracle and convert one thousand people to vote for biden, it wouldn’t make a bit of difference.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        jUsT VoTE!!1!!11

        As if voting for president makes any difference, when it’s the electoral college who makes the final decision. And they’ve proven in the past that they’ll do what they want.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s been trending for some time. Chomsky’s “Manufacturing Consent” describes a host of national policies that were intensely disliked when they began and only became normalized after years of mass media manipulation.

      The Drug Wars, opposition to the Civil Rights and Women’s Rights movements, most of our wars after WW2, our large scale claw backs of social spending and ballooning security state budgets, our habit of subsidizing sports stadiums and toxic waste sites, etc - all need regular continued media investment for fear of a popular turn.

      SCOTUS widened the spigots for political spending in pursuit of these goals. But it’s not like the WSJ or AM Radio or the cable news companies weren’t already flush with propaganda before the CU decision. It’s not like CU was necessary for the volume of social media manipulation, either.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        No the decisions weren’t necessary for all that, but for the one simple graph tracking campaign costs it was particularly salient.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    I remember watching this nearly 6 years after release and how relevant it still was. It still is relevant. End Citizens United if you want to even begin to take our country back.

  • poorlytunedAstring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I understand that this is a doomer sub but man. When you manage to get away from all this social media bullshit for a while then try to poke your head in you realize how relentlessly negative it is at all times, because nobody wants to actually do anything about anything, including go the fuck outside and forget about it for a bit, and everyone with any ambitions of sanity leaves.

    Could we start discussing credible strategies to reverse this situation, or at least improve that number somehow? Absolutely the fuck not, never, ever ever. The shit is very literally crazy, I don’t know what I was trying to expect.

    But this post is so much like the other posts on the rest of the site it took me a minute to notice where I was. Might as well stop acting like this is just one community, it’s everything.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Could we start discussing credible strategies to reverse this situation, or at least improve that number somehow?

      I say this constantly, and everyone nods along happily when I say it, but almost nobody does it. What is it? It’s getting involved in your local politics.

      The federal government, the US congress and senate and all the executive branch… they’re all supported and propped up by powerful institutions within the states that got powerful because nobody paid it any attention and still don’t. People get elected to represent us who run without opposition and then we wonder why nothing seems to change.

      If you get involved with knowing who in your neighborhood, your school district, your city, your county and your state represent you, and then challenging that representation in any way you can, from actually running all the way to just getting on those horrible neighborhood forums and holding yard-sales to get to know your neighbors.

      GET TO KNOW YOUR NEIGHBORS. Jesus, this country is terrible about this one huge thing that could change everything, which is reforming communities. We scream and cry how bad the world is and make ZERO effort to make it better by forming support systems within neighborhoods. I mean fuck, most suburban neighborhoods have nothing else to do, might as well have some bake sales and yard sales and jogging groups and other things to help get to know each other, right? Or has all our cynicism completely overshadowed any possible chance of ever forming friendly communities in the US?

      • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        GET TO KNOW YOUR NEIGHBORS.

        I move every year because my rent keeps going up and I can’t afford to stay. In some places ive been they offer a discount the first year then it goes up to the “normal rate”.

        Sorry to my MAGA neighbor that broke my headlight, I can’t afford to stay and educate you.

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Get involved with Represent.Us, the site that was linked to.

      They have a pretty good strategy, and they have been making progress.

      Governance is discouraging because it’s complex. And when things are complex, it’s difficult to see progress and it’s easy to predict that there will be problems.

      It’s also difficult (and unrewarding) to have serious conversations about this stuff on social media.

      The posts get too long, with no satisfying simplistic conclusion, and even if you make an incredible magnum opus of a post that acknowledges enough complexity to be realistic while also being short and snappy enough to catch people’s attention… it drops off of the trending posts algorithm after a day.

    • Thteven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      As long as there is money to be made in politics the common man will be trodden upon. Good luck getting the people making all the money to change the laws.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      If sad facts just bring you down instead of making you act to fix them, then you are part of the problem.

      • Moneo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ok, so now what? You’re going to shit on people for being depressed about the state of the world and feeling powerless because of how powerless they are?

        If you want people to engage in solutions I’d recommend not belittling them for succumbing to apathy in the face of overwhelming opposition.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Expand the house. Drop the ratio to something much closer to the original one, (1 representative for 30,000 people). It’s theorized that a ratio around 1:100,000 is low enough to provide more accountability. It would mean a house around 3600 representatives but they’d be very responsible to their local communities. And we could institute a system where only senior members are in D.C. with others joining them only for very sensitive meetings that couldn’t be held using the secure intranet the military has.

      This expansion would obliterate party control and lobbying. There’s just too many representatives at that point and too many seats to fund. The price tag of campaigning would drop precipitously, making elections intensely local again.

    • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean that is basically how social media and news etc. work. Negative emotions are the strongest, and possibly produce the most reactions. And that’s what all of this lives from. Probably one of the reasons why the human world is slowly gonig to shit (well there I did feed it^^). I think though it’s really difficult to combat this shitty political situation we’re in basically worldwide, it’s almost self-driving into a well not so human-friendly (nor life at all) world.

      But I obviously agree. Just actually do stuff that doesn’t feed this downward spiral. I.e. do stuff with friends, pursue hobbys, do sports etc. Be a good example for others (e. g. show that a more climate friendly life doesn’t need to degrade happiness, or could even be helpful). That IME leads to much more happiness, healthier life (physically and psychological), less misanthropism etc.

    • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You don’t vote for people who don’t represent you.

      Our first past the post voting system is mathematically flawed to always result in a two party system through strategic voting.

      People are not free to vote for who best represents them because they would let someone who represents them even less win the election.

      While this spoiler effect is inherent in First Past The Post voting, there are other voting systems where there is no spoiler effect.

      So here we are, chained in the trunk of the car these two legacy political parties drove off a cliff into a river.

      And the Water rises… take a deep breath.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        For that first part to work we must vote for better candidates at the lower level and stop voting for the media selected consensus candidate in primaries.

        Otherwise we’re just disengaging from the system and letting two people pass the presidency back and forth.

    • Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE

      Municipal, provincial, federal. I don’t fucking know how your country works just fucking vote. Pretty pleaaaaaase.

    • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I did, and the primary to. Then the people who I voted alongside of talked massive shit about me because I didn’t smile hard enough while voting for “the most pro-labor president”.

      Then they didn’t do anything to fix the First Past the Post voting system and the spoiler effect that comes along side it. Despite lecturing people over and over about its mathematical flaws whenever anyone mentioned voting outside the two party system.

      I will vote for your blue conservatives, but don’t try to fool me that I am represented with things as they are.

    • Veraxus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      For what, exactly? The parties choose who we’re allowed to vote for. Until we abolish FPTP and implement RCV, there will be no democracy in America.

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Duh? We know already know this. Their main concern is staying in office for as long as possible and see how badly they can fuck up the country.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Duh? We know already know this. Their main concern is staying in office for as long as possible and see how badly they can fuck up the country. much they can grow their own bank accounts.

      The destruction of the country is just a byproduct of their greed. :(

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Each congressperson represents too many people.

    We need to add seats to the House of Representatives.

    • crusa187
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Let’s add some seats to the Supreme Court while we’re at it.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      We can’t do that or Republicans will never have control of government.

      I mean that’s a good thing, and we’ll finally have some semblance of representation, but it’s exactly why we can’t do it. :(

  • sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Is this the 20 year old study being pulled out for 2024 election cycle?

    PS 10 years

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Quality of life getting better, people around me buying houses and having children…

        Not

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          People around you are buying houses??? You mean like real people, and not chinese puppet companies who buy entire cities in an attempt to artificially inflate rent prices?

          • Bob Robertson IX@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Houses in my neighborhood are selling as soon as they hit the market, and yes, my neighbors are real people and are actually the homeowners. The family that just moved in next door are immigrants, the wife is a manager at a logistics center and her husband works nights at the local Amazon warehouse.

            • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Wait…you live in an area where people own their own homes, and talk to their neighbors???

              My neighbor moved in 15 years ago. I had no idea until 6 years ago. Still haven’t talked to him, or know his name. I just know sometimes he wears green shirts.

              I hope he has family and loved ones. If he got hit by a bus, I’d hate for his obituary to read

              “He was a quiet neighbor, who sometimes wore green shirts. One time he had a dog, but I think he was just dog watching for a friend. Beautiful dog though. Golden retriever, healthy full coat of fur.”

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I just know sometimes he wears green shirts

                That’s Dave. I’d steer clear unless you’re into Warhammer 40k

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Thank you for the precise info.

        I was being hyperbolic no doubt. But point still stands tho lol

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I don’t think people realize how much graft is built into the system.

      • Bribery is near impossible to prove. (Thanks SCOTUS)
      • You can effectively keep left over campaign funds.
      • Insider trading does not apply to you.
      • Your paycheck is expected to cover 2 offices, staff at each, 2 homes, frequent travel between them, and your political advisors.
      • Fundraising is organized by the party, stay on their good side and you get help and resources to raise money. Introduced to the right people, etc. Get on the wrong side and get cut off.

      It’s no wonder our elected representatives treat small donations like mana from heaven, we’re effectively paying them. And they treat the capitol building like a stock trading room because that’s their real retirement fund, their key to independence from the party.

  • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    If we replaced first past the post voting with a more representative electoral system, we could inject competition into the electoral process.

    Then maybe they would have to care.

    • Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Representatives chosen by sortition like jury duty would be more representative compared to what we currently have, and that’s such a wild thought.

  • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    In the last 5 years alone, the 200 most politically active companies in the U.S. spent $5.8 billion influencing our government with lobbying and campaign contributions. Those same companies got $4.4 trillion in taxpayer support — earning a return of 750 times their investment.

    An no one bats an eye… you should be rioting in the streets