![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Oh yeah, maybe it was a package deal and they only really cared about the training data.
Oh yeah, maybe it was a package deal and they only really cared about the training data.
I don’t get why Google would agree to pay for anything. Google can survive without Reddit, but Reddit would be hurt without Google and would eventually be forced to give in. Where’s that corporate greed when you need it?
This is unironically the answer. You can’t make a general-purpose captcha solver AI if every website or group of websites uses a completely different kind of captcha.
Yep. Not always larger necessarily, but close to the same size on average, or maybe a little smaller if the domain is limited and compression can be applied. Not really useful.
It also means that people with no friends already using it simply can’t join. Big oof for them.
Invitation only services are bad.
That’s an absurd hurdle for accessing an online service. I guess I shouldn’t expect people on the fediverse to understand, considering the barriers to entry it has.
That sounds infeasible in the real world. 90% of the population isn’t even going to understand a system like that, much less be willing to use it.
Like, she admitted to it? Not calling you a liar, just trying to imagine how you’d go about proving that something didn’t happen.
Then don’t hire someone who’s a bad shot but might still hit (he was very close, he hit his ear!), hire someone willing to shoot blanks.
You have to pay to delete messages? I think that’s illegal in Europe.
I don’t think he was sponsored by any sort of organization because he was apparently known to be a bad shot. It just wouldn’t make any sense for a third party to choose him of all people to take the shot.
Uh, I’m not OP.
Why do you feel the need to make such statements regarding the motivation without any source or evidence to back them up?
It’s also completely unnecessary. The shooter was a registered republican and apparently known to be a horrible shot, so he wasn’t left-wing and definitely wasn’t recruited by any organization for his sharpshooting skills.
Thank you. That’s a great example of real whataboutism.
Oh, for sure. It is very sad.
That’s not whataboutism. I’m showing the hypocrisy in one rule being justified, but not the other, so as to argue more effectively against the age rule. Whataboutism is when you change the subject.
Yeah, everything will look cyan if the projector can’t put out red.