• andyburke@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Capitalism allowed the global north and “west” to outpace those other countries and exploit them in the first place. It wasn’t moral, but capitalism is what positioned them in the first place.

    • Cowbee [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes, via violent domestic and hyper-violent international exploitation.

      Read the linked text.

      • andyburke@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Like I said, it wasn’t moral. It is still a result of capitalism. Think we’ve probably finished here because you’re not my teacher and you don’t assign me reading.

        • Cowbee [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It was not, it was a result of industrialization, followed by Imperialism.

          Suit yourself though.

          • andyburke@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Colonial imperialism began with industrialization in your explanation? Capitalist countries were colonizing the world well before the industrial revolution.

            • Cowbee [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Colonialism is not the same as what I am referring to as Imperialism. I specifically mean the point at which Capitalism reaches outward and exports Capital to less developed countries to super-exploit for super-profits.