• ThatsMrCharlieToYou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    Constant appeasement has been the cause of so much more conflict as a whole. No sane country wants conflict but when it arises, it needs to be crushed at its source. It cannot stand and each nation should be afraid to commit such atrocities in fear of the response. Tying conditions to aid given to the Ukrainian war effort is ludicrous. France should be very proud of their commitment to fight for what is very clearly right and other nations should follow in their footsteps. I am not advocating that Ukraine starts blasting missiles at civilians centres in Russia but they should be free to strike infrastructure that has clear ties to the invasion. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

      • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        21 days ago

        russians have been claiming they’ve been fighting the whole NATO for 2 years so I don’t see this as an escalation.

        • FreudianCafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          What you see as an escalation really doesnt matter. Russian state has made it very clear that this would be escalation and would have a response

          • Sonori@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            21 days ago

            Opinion pieces on the Internet and political saber rattling by low level politicians does not a nuclear policy make.

            States actually have quite a few different ways of signaling they are serious about potentially ending the world as we know it, and Russia is currently using none of them.

            As an example, the Russian state’s own published nuclear policy has remained unchanged for over a decade and still explicitly prohibits nuclear first use in cases like this. Currently high level Russian politicians including Putin continue to reference said defense policy in response to questions about the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine. If they were seriously considering using said nuclear weapons in Ukraine, they would be unambiguously signaling through changing these documents and other such methods that other governments actually take seriously.

            More to the point, breaking the nuclear taboo would be massively harmful to both Russia and Putins own interests. It would at best result in a NATO backed no fly zone over Ukraine while China and Iran completely abandon them, and quite possibly result in a direct conventional or nuclear war with Nato. I simply don’t buy that they would do that with no warning or previous signaling simply because an artillery rocket was manufactured in a different country.

          • Skua@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            21 days ago

            Several NATO members have already okayed this for Ukraine and remain distinctly un-nuked. Plus, of course, the Ukrainians have been doing it with their domestically-produced gear for ages and also haven’t been nuked.