• morrowind
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    Note this is a guest essay, so not actually by the NYT. Personally I think he makes good points.

      • morrowind
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        Like that eventually the virus is going to break through, and they should be prepared, instead of relying on zero-tolerance continuing to work.

        • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 years ago

          The problem is what does preparation for this “eventual” spread have to do with the zero-covid policy? They say in the article that China is ill equipped to handle the pandemic in case it spreads. In that case is delaying this “eventual” spread not the right thing to do? Why cannot they prepare for it while keeping zero-covid policy in place?

          The article is vague sophistry and just another iteration of “the coming collapse of China” copium.

          For clarification I put “eventual” in quotes because I am not sure if it is destined that China will see a breakout, seeing how the “civilised” world has ensured with their vaccine patent enforcements and their domestic vaccinstion policies that thr virus will never die out.

        • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Has that not worked for over a year? This isn’t the first pandemic China has had to deal with: they learned from swine flu, that catching these early and quarantining regions was the best way to prevent deaths. Zero tolerance has worked and will continue to work.