• TwinTusks@bitforged.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      To be honest, that doesnt look all that comfortable, rooftop (dirty ground), batsuit (bulletproof? so I guess its hard?).

      • Ms. ArmoredThirteen
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well cats will lay on literally anything and look comfortable and batman is a slut for being miserable so I think it’ll be fine

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Everyone always brings up stuff like that but in the moment no one would care. Endorphins are pumping emotions are on fire and they already wanna fuck each other.

        It happens.

      • mrunicornman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        And presumably they’ve been fighting crime all night in those suits so they’re likely quite sweaty and dirty. And it’s Gotham dirt. Catwoman’s going to wake up with a UTI.

        • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Batman has a utility belt. Do you think he doesn’t have something to freshen up his breath or wipe down his face after getting sprayed with all sorts of shit.

  • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 months ago

    to abide by certain rules governing character behavior in order to protect the franchise and consumer products sales.

    TIL that superheroes are also obligated to fight against 4rth wall problems

    • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes?

      In this case it’s corporate being especially protective of Batman, and terrified of anything that might affect toy sales (among other things). IIRC Justice League unlimited had quite a few episodes shot down or rewritten because of various Batman related edicts from on high. And parental backlash after Batman Returns is part of why we got Joel Schumacher. Hell, it’s how we got Robin and the no killing rule, because they wanted to make the comics more marketable to kids.

      Shit on the other side of the 4th wall is often the biggest problem superheroes face, and not just through censorship. It’s why Spider-Man made a deal with the devil. And it’s why Arkham has a revolving door, since popular and marketable villains need to keep coming back (which is why the “Batman should kill people” argument is idiotic, as any villain that won’t stay in jail will also refuse to stay dead).

      These are corporate owned characters. The company in charge is going to care far more about making money and protecting their brand than they will about art, consistency, or even whether their policies are rational. Hell, they canceled a Green Lantern show that was popular and successful because they weren’t happy with the fucking toy sales.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        And it’s why Arkham has a revolving door, since popular and marketable villains need to keep coming back

        Also the fault of the stupid comic code that required the bad guy to lose by the end of the issue.

      • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        thanks for this great insight!

        the only thing i knew related with toy sales are ewoks.

        green lantern, being a popular show, definitely scaled up the money factor.

  • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    “As sure as I am that he fucks bats, I know he doesn’t go down on women” - DC, probably

    Seriously, I know the creators had to fight for the commissioner Gordon storyline, but how did they not allow this given all the other stuff in that show?? Show runners were spot on with the selfish lover comment.

  • macmacfire
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    Ah yes, a true hero

    spoiler

    resurrects his dead parents into florahuman abominations.

  • yemmly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    “A true hero penetrates.”

    Edit: Put it in quotes so that you can tell that this is meant as satire.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In a rather surprising revelation, the co-creator of the R-rated Harley Quinn animated series told Variety that DC blocked the inclusion of a scene from the upcoming third season of the show where Batman was going to perform oral sex on Catwoman.

    “In this third season of Harley [coming to HBO Max] we had a moment where Batman was going down on Catwoman,” Justin Halpern said.

    Superhero content creators are generally expected to abide by certain rules governing character behavior in order to protect the franchise and consumer products sales.

    DC is at least open to the idea of expressing a romantic side to its characters whereas rival Marvel is considered extremely chaste.

    In this week’s episode of The Hollywood Reporter’s ‘TV’s Top 5’ podcast, Loki writer Michael Waldron was asked about Marvel’s prudishness and whether the character Vision even has genitals.

    “It’s the biggest piece of entertainment in the world right now that encompasses such a large spectrum of fans and age ranges when you get into sexuality.


    The original article contains 465 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 64%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!