• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    If it’s as private as they claim it shouldn’t be an issue.

    • umbrella
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      how can we make sure that claim isnt bullshit?

      • pietervdvn
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        How can we make sure their privacy claims about search aren’t bullshit?

        (I still trust them though, just pointing out it is an equivalent problem)

  • Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    It is neither, their AI search features only optional at this stage. It is one of the most private implementations of AI that I’ve seen though.

    • 7heo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      It is one of the most private implementations of AI that I’ve seen though.

      Based on what information/criteria?

  • dragnucs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Try SearXNG. SearXNG is a free internet metasearch engine which aggregates results from more than 70 search services. Users are neither tracked nor profiled. Additionally, SearXNG can be used over Tor for online anonymity.

    List of available instances.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s neither. Why do you expect they calculating an answer to have any impact at privacy?

    • sag@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I mean DDG search is safe, but my search results and search queries are going through AI, who knows they are collecting it

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 months ago

        DDG already sends your search query to third parties. What they don’t send is your identity.

        (Or, at least they say they don’t, whether you trust them is your option. Any 3rd party can betray your trust.)

        Anyway, that image implies an in-house implementation.

        • sag@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Really? It mean it only use Wikipedia. Then IDC.

          • Zoot@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            Personally I’ve used it a few times, I tend to get my answer significantly easier than wading through the shit results DDG has been giving me.

    • sag@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh no :( DDG also becoming bad. Can you suggest me any other search engine (Not Self Hosted one).

      • RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        DDG is still the best non self host search engine imao. But Startpage and Swisscows are also great options and don’t have the AI stuff and some neat features like private preview (both) or music search (swisscows). Of those two options startpage is superior in privacy

      • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’m currently stuck using DuckDuckGo myself, just with the AI fluff disabled in settings. I’ve tried various other search engines but they’re either also buying in the LLM hype, or are just Not There Yet™ (https://stract.com, for example), or both.

      • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        Brave Search. At this point, I almost never need a different one. They also have optional AI but they’re doing so in a way that preserves privacy.

  • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    No, VLC is its own thing however it uses libavcodec from the FFmpeg project for a large number of the codecs included in VLC. But VLC is far from being just an FFmpeg GUI.

  • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    They claim not to save your chats and not to use them for improving the AI model. Using GPT-3.5 Turbo through DuckDuckGo is definitely better than using your phone number to sign up for an OpenAI account, so yes, I think it makes sense to use this. But ideally, you could just run an AI model offline on your own hardware, I recently saw a Lemmy comment that explains this very well: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/10348570

    You can also use @db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com’s AI Horde as explained here: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/9295041

  • massivefailure@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why.

    To hell with anything using this AI garbage. Apparently I’m going to have to completely stop using computers because all these idiot companies are using this trash technology that just steals from other sites and presents it as its own. Time to move on from DDG.

  • conductor@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you will use it your question will be sent to OpenAI or Anthropic and possibly DuckDuckGo companies + search engines it is connected to.

    If you don’t your question will be sent to the website you chose, possibly to DuckDuckGo + search engines it uses.

    So you decide what is more private in this case.

  • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Honestly their results have been absolute shit for a while now. All I get are big business (mostly MS with Bing) results like Amazon links or worst yet, some BS AI built website with poorly stolen info meant to just push visitor traffic and not actually provide value.

    I’ve been looking into alternates and find Yandex actually provides real results. They don’t blacklist either something all the major US engines do because DMCA.

    At this point it’s like to I give up privacy and get real results or stick with DDG that seems in MS’ pocket so I have little trust they are still anonymizing your results.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’m not sure, but if I’m going to use AI features, I’d trust DDG more than I’d trust the big players in AI.

  • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    As unfortunate as it is, the only way privacy search engines will survive is by adding AI. Brave recognized this early on and implemented it very well, so I’m glad to see DDG seems to be implementing it well also. Hopefully Startpage catches up because even though I almost exclusively use Brave Search, I do enjoy Startpage as a secondary source.

    • RobotDaniel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Honestly I see no use for the ai response in search as it is hard to trust 100% but I do see that it could become a requirement for a search engine

      • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I agree somewhat. I know how to use a search engine, I don’t need AI. The main problem is that, sadly, AI is going to be required to stay competitive.

        I will say Brave’s AI is very useful, though.