The author’s profile says this:

“Have taken up farming.”

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Finally it’s official. I think it’s a good move to make it an archived repository, so everyone knows for a fact this is not developed anymore. That means bugs or security issues are no longer actively searched and corrected. I wonder if this program will be taken out from distribution repositories now. My personal alternative is fastfetch .

    Edit: … oh, I didn’t realize all of his repositories are now archived. Not only neofetch: https://github.com/dylanaraps?tab=repositories

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      Hopefully the dev is doing well, and has luck with whatever he’s doing now

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        7 months ago

        Looking at the readme edit history: https://github.com/dylanaraps/dylanaraps/commits/master/

        1. First edit 3 years ago: Away till the New Year. Merry Christmas.
        2. Then next edit 10 month ago replacing that line with: On hiatus.
        3. Then next edit 4 days ago replacing that line with: Have taken up farming.

        English is not my native language, and I don’t understand what “Have taken up farming.”, but I have my guesses. means. Normally I don’t interpret such a situation, but it doesn’t look good. Most contributions of the software is 3 years old, and only a few readme and link updates recently are made alongside making everything archived.

        • bjorney@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          45
          ·
          7 months ago

          English is not my native language, and I don’t understand what “Have taken up farming.”

          It means they aren’t developing software anymore because they are growing vegetables instead

          • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 months ago

            Hmm, maybe it really means it literally. I mean it would not surprise me if the person really started or taken over by farming and giving up programming. Be it having too much pressure from all sites, for writing software that many people use. Or be it financial. Who knows. I wish him best luck.

            • andrew@radiation.party
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s not unheard of in folks who are in software dev because they love the repetition and routine. Farming is pretty similar to programming a computer, just with tons more manual labor.

              • not_amm
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                So true, I’m still a student, but taking care of my plants daily is relaxing and repetitive, also some problem solving when there are plagues lol

            • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              You are probably right that it isn’t literal. In IT I often hear “Goat farming” as meaning getting out of IT.

  • umbrella
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    there should be some kind of notification system whenever something goes unmaintained. ive used unmaintained software for way too long before finding out theres some fork.

    • Reawake9179@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      As long as it works perfectly and it makes no security related headlines, i’m fine with running abandoned ware.

      If something stops working it’s time to find out the alternatives.

      Not every little tool needs weekly updates

      • umbrella
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        the finding out alternatives is the annoying part for me, you always have to be on some niche place online (eg lemmy) to discover them. that and ive used a lot of security sensitive abandonware i really wouldnt otherwise.

        • sleepmode@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Hackernews is usually reliable to see what the new hotness is. But yeah this is a frequent problem.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        As long as it works perfectly and it makes no security related headlines, i’m fine with running abandoned ware.

        That means Windows XP is perfectly okay as abandon ware, becuase it makes no security related headlines. :p (just joking!)

    • DessalinesA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      On arch’s user repository, packages can get marked as out of date, unmaintained, and sometimes removed entirely.

      • umbrella
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        i didnt know that, is the user notified somehow?

        • DessalinesA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          When you run pacman or one of the aur helpers, it’ll tell you.

          • umbrella
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            thats actually awesome! would love to see it on more package managers!

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Software which achieved no actual purpose discontinued. Open source community in tears.

  • deikoepfiges_dreirad@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why would this little bash script that does nothing extraordinary need constant updates? Some pieces of software might just be complete as they are.