• joojmachineOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s probably best to assume that since that funding was provided to be used with a specific focus, they didn’t (and/or couldn’t) use it for the Foundation’s maintenance.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Likely earmarked for development.

      And Gnome Foundation handles non-development stuff, like hackathons, Guadec, community outreach, liaising with other projects/governments/companies, etc. not to mention boring legal stuff like copyright of their name and icons and all that jazz.

      It’s basically the non-development part of the project.

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You know, they were too busy wasting money on reinventing the wheel and coming up with “a vision” to be able to sort their budget.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        We get it, you don’t like gnome. That doesn’t mean they waste money. Some of us like the desktop gasps

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Wasting? Gnome is amazing. Money and time extremely well spent.

        I get that some people hate that Gnome isn’t another WinUX desktop, but they need to get over it. Either accept it and adapt to a more modern workflow, add an extension like Dash to Panel, or use one of the dozen other desktop environments, most of which are designed with a WinUX or something similar.

        I also don’t really see why you’re putting quotes around vision lol. Every project has a vision.