I’ve gathered that a lot of people in the nix space seem to dislike snaps but otherwise like Flatpaks, what seems to be the difference here?
Are Snaps just a lot slower than flatpaks or something? They’re both a bit bloaty as far as I know but makes Canonicals attempt worse?
Personally I think for home users or niche there should be a snap less variant of this distribution with all the bells and whistles.
Sure it might be pointless, but you could argue that for dozens of other distros that take Debian, Fedora or Arch stuff and make it as their own variant, I.e MX Linux or Manjaro.
What are your thoughts?
Except flatpak does it better and it doesn’t try to reinvent the wheel. All flatpak uses is bubblewrap
deleted by creator
What is a “system application”? If it is part of the system wouldn’t you not want to sandbox it? Also selinux exists for a reason.
deleted by creator
I’m pretty sure my knowledge isn’t complete. However, I still don’t see anything good about snaps
deleted by creator