• AnomalousBit@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The explanations provided in this article are the same stupid fucking reasons it’s next to impossible and dangerous to ride a bike in America.

    No, a bike is not a car and it should not be treated like one.

    No, no one I know wants to hop on a bike and share the same lane as a semi truck or teenager in a lifted truck texting on a phone.

    Having a bike lane (preferably separate from the main road) where there is at least some breathing room is the only way most people would even consider it. God forbid you should fall off or crash, you don’t risk losing your life over something that would otherwise be a scraped knee.

    GTFO with your bikes are cars bull shit.

    • Tangentism
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s going to take several generations to remove the shit stain of “vehicular cycling” that John Forester has left behind

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you wouldn’t trust your child to safely bike the lane, the lane is unsafe for any cyclist is how I like to look at it.

    • delirious_owl@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, a bike is a car and should be treated like one. I’m tired of assholes like you yelling ‘get off the road’ or telling me to endanger pedestrians by riding in the sidewalk or mixed use trail or the door lane or the bicycle gutter.

      What we need is normal roads with barriers blocking off cars from entering.

      Bikes are cars. Treat us like them.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        What we need is normal roads with barriers blocking off cars from entering.

        Bikes are cars.

        So pedestrians only on these roads? Like a sidewalk?

        Or are you saying bikes should be treated JUST like cars, except better, with routes that exclude cars?

        It sounds like what you want is separated, protected, raised bicycle lanes.

        And I’m no fan of rising on the sidewalks, but cycling is literally one of the uses for a mixed use trail.

        • biddy@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          delirious_owl is being pretty inflammatory but they make a good point.

          All too often a supposed “bike lane” is just built to a worse standard than parallel car lanes. It will have a worse road surface, sharp bends, confusing and long routing, less priority at intersections and traffic lights. Car lanes are the default and bike lanes are squeezed in as an afterthought.

          This needs to change, bike lanes should be built to the same or higher standard as roads(although typically bike lanes can be much narrower). Multi lane bike motorways need to be buldozed through neighborhoods. An easy way to do this is just take part or all of an existing road and make it bike only.

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Please no more bulldozing neighbourhoods. Bike lanes would be far easier to accomodate in a neighbourhood than a 6+ lane freeway was.

        • delirious_owl@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          What I’m saying is that in the eyes of the law, bicycles are the same as cars. Bikes belong on roads that are built for vehicular traffic.

          I don’t want a different type of narrow trail that’s raised and windy with roots and trash. I want to use roads that are built to spec for cars. Fortunately, we already have plenty of them. The only problem is that cars are using them too.

          If you want to make the road safer for bicycles, then ban vehicles with motors from half the roads. Like NYC and Berkeley have done.

          If you don’t want to ban cars, then paint a big green stripe down the middle of the furthest right lane with a picture of a bicycle to make it clear to cars that that is the lane for bicycles and cars should pass bicycles in the passing lane. Like what Oakland has done.

              • Tangentism
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                https://roadswerenotbuiltforcars.com

                Roads existed before cars & it was cycling organisations that campaigned to have them tarmacked & sealed for everyone’s benefit

                Pavements were not built for vehicles yet in the UK over 350 people are killed or seriously injured by vehicles mounting it.

                • delirious_owl@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I have. And on the Autobahn in Germany.

                  They need to put a green stripe in the right most lanes and say that cars are not allowed in that lane, except for exiting. With extreme speed restrictions.

              • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Roads for cars are built almost exclussively for just cars. Its half the reason this community even exists. Roads speced for bikes wouldn’t need to tolerate nearly as much weight nor would they need to be as wide as car lanes. Many intersections would also be served with yields rather than traffic lights as most bike traffic can negotiate intersections easily.

                • delirious_owl@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  That type of logic is why I prefer roads to bike trails.

                  Motorcycles need the full width of a road, so do bicycles. When engineers lower the specs for bicycles, they are thinking of a child riding 5 kph on a Sunday rec ride, but we need roads designed for cargo bikes hauling a weeks worth of groceries or rebar and cement down hill at 40 kph.

                  When you make the lanes smaller or don’t clean the land of debris or permit sharper turns, you endanger the lives of cyclists. That’s not OK. Cyclists are vehicles and our roads should meet the same specs as all roads.

                  • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Technically speaking. Motorcycle do not need the full width. It is not uncommon to see them side by side in a single lane.

                    If your bike max speed is 40kph, thats the slower side of car speeds so the roads could still be designed far differently for bikes.

      • Bartsbigbugbag
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        They ride thousands of electric scooters on the sidewalks in China daily and rarely does anyone ever get hurt. Maybe you just suck ass at riding.