I recently got a Sony prs 600 e reader from 2009. The battery is at the end of its life (It lasts about 3 days with heavy reading, and a couple weeks without reading). No backlight, no Wi-Fi, just an SD card that I can load epub files and small PDFs. The screen is slow and the contrast isn’t the best. The “touch screen” is the old resistive type where you really need to press with your nail or a stylus. Despite all those flaws, it’s fantastic. It’s just good enough for reading books.

I read with large text so I don’t even need to put on glasses, and it’s easier to read than an actual book. Combined with Anna’s archive, I’m reading more than I ever have before. No Wi-Fi nd slow screen make the experience feel closer to an actual book than a smartphone. It’s great to just have a device do one thing without distractions popping up every minute.

It’s all old technology, but it’s so rare to see anyone with an e-reader. Probably because they’re still expensive and designed to microtransact the fuck out of you.

So do you think there could be a simple open source e reader? I see pine64 is making the “pinenote”, but it’s still just the developer version, it’s expensive, doesn’t have an sd card, and looks like it’s trying to be a lot more than an reader. Maybe it’ll come down in cost, or they’ll release a simpler version? The biggest obstacle for making an e-reader seems to be the screen, so maybe the pinenote’s screen could become something of a standard.

Or maybe I’m overthinking it, because there’s already so many old Kindles and nooks out there that could be improved with a new battery and maybe new firmware too.

Thoughts?

  • Patches@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Epub are the de facto open source standard. That’s like a “MP3 Player” only playing Wav.

    How do you blunder it that bad?

    • Jordan_U
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      "The Open Book is my long-standing attempt to design a comprehensible and accessible e-book reader that you can build yourself (or at least have manufactured affordably). The current edition is something I’m calling the “Abridged” or “Developer Preview” edition. It’s designed to be incredibly simple: there are 7 through-hole and 14 surface mount components, nearly all in a chunky 1206 package that’s easy to hand solder. The tradeoff is that it has no LiPo charging circuit; instead it uses AAA batteries, making it a bit more chunky than previous versions of the book.

      The goal with this version is to get hardware in hands so we can start hacking on firmware."

      https://www.oddlyspecificobjects.com/projects/openbook/

      So:

      • This is a hobby / project of love
      • The current focus is on hardware

      I’m sure that the eventual plan is to support ePub.

      I’m not sure it will ever get there, because it’s not a well resourced project, but I personally don’t like criticizing one person’s efforts, which they are making freely available.

        • Jordan_U
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          “I was referring to open book reader…”

          The lack of capitalization, and the project name that could just as easily be a descriptor, made me miss it at first too.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      What are you even talking about? I was referring to open book reader which others already mentioned which should have been easy enough to realize by PCB sandwich. Unless things have developed significantly since I last checked in on the project it does not take epub as is and needs to be txt (got auto corrected to text in previous post).

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I was talking about the file format only allowing .txt being a blunder.

        Epub is a drm free format with no royalties. And it’s the de facto standard all over the internet.

        • Grass@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Oh I see that makes sense now and is the reason I didn’t jump on the project when I first heard about it.