• ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I am pretty sure the lesser part of corruption is cash. Probably more stuff like exchanging a lucrative contract for political support.

    They are not stupid. Afterall cash needs to be explained, a good contract gives you cash and the explanation.

    • utopiah
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Can’t say in terms of proportion cash vs. non-cash but one might want to watch the Qatargate recent documentary on Arte which shows that somehow a 700k EUR luggage was found in the house of a MEP. Piles of cash sound outdated yet clearly still exist nowadays.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Cash is mostly traceable at point of contact unless you keep it in a money bin and don’t spend it, though…

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not necessarily, it’s only traceable if you generate receipts on both sides. I don’t know about EU law, but in the US, you only need to report cash deposits if they’re over $10k, and if your deposits are always over $10k (e.g. you’re a big retailer or something), another $10k here and there won’t raise any eyebrows.

        Cash is still king when it comes to corruption since it’s easy to exchange it for favors w/o generating a receipt at all.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The 500€ bill was removed from circulation because it was used almost exclusively for corruption and illegal trade.