• NutWrench
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    But what about the billionaires? Who’s helping them out, huh?

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    WHAT IF:

    We didn’t rely on a system that requires infinite growth to make shareholders money that drives under- and unemployment in order to make those profits?

    • pingveno
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Small but steady inflation is good. The macroeconomic fear is that people will just hold onto their money in the form of raw currency. That’s bad. Currency is for a more convenient representation of value. I can’t compensate a roofer in computer code, so currency is a stand-in. But it also shouldn’t languish or else the economy stagnates. The world used to regularly experience zero inflation or deflation, which hurt the economy. As much as we’ve had some instability lately, things are nowhere near as bad as they could be.

      Of course the flip side - hyperinflation - is also bad, but that’s not what we’re talking about here.

      • Johanno@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok ok ok. Now explain to me: if inflation is supposed to ensure people don’t horde money/value

        How is it possible that Jeff Besos hords the income of a country?

        Yes his value is bound in shares and stuff but still he is holding 185 Billion $ of value to his person.

        In comparison to see how much money that is look at this website :

        https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/

        It seems that at a certain point of wealth the rules don’t apply anymore.

        • pingveno
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          He is putting that wealth to work by keeping it invested in his company instead of stuffing it under his mattress. That’s exactly how it’s supposed to work. That wealth is doing work for him and for the rest of the economy in the form of Amazon stock (setting aside various ethical qualms about Amazon). Stock is nothing more than an abstract representation of a slice of a company to allow for distributed ownership and for companies to raise capital. So instead of purchasing goods and services from a company, a shareholder provides raw capital to exchange for a slice of the company. That would make sense for a wealthier person who can only buy so many yachts and massages (goods and services), but it applies equally well to someone who is trying to sock some money away for retirement and have it grow over time.

    • pancake@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Printing money is just one way that inflation can appear. The latest trends in that respect are in fact not caused by money-printing.

    • Avnar@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can tell you want would happen. The Collaps of Capitalims. Because Capitalism needs the State to protect it with police force, Military and Bailouts. Thats the only reason States exist. The Ruleing classes need to work together to keep the rest under controll and to legitamise themselfes with Laws. States are always a tool of one class to rule over the others. They will never change in that regard.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dear capitalists: If your excuse that you can’t ‘survive’ (actual excuse I’ve heard from capitalists) without gouging people, your system is busted.

  • shiveyarbles@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The trick is to do the very minimum to help the lower class, get them to hate each other, and hate immigrants… but for some reason, not pay attention to the billionaires hiding behind the curtain.

  • OpenStars@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s kind of a scary thought, that I think humanity is about to try out next. As in, who needs the humans anymore, when robots will do the same tasks with far less effort?:-|

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s existed since slavery. Thinly veiled with ‘we’re an individualistic society’ and ‘pull yourself up by your bootstraps’.

  • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    We fucking didn’t. Our lords n masters decided they needed a new underclass to keep them going and this is all gonna end very very badly. Importing people from fucking fighting nations into polite nations causes 2 fighting nations.

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because greedy, selfish assholes are very, very good at abusing and ruining a society for their own benefit. Keeping them out of the way and from making trouble is the only way the kind of society OP posted about would have any chance to survive long-term.

        We really need to find a way to do that. Maybe entice them away with a kingship on Mars, or something?

        • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the solution is for all the non assholes to work together to stamp out the assholes and remove them from having power. Incredibly difficult, but not impossible. It’s the same class war that’s been waged by the wealthy for decades. Theyve never stopped attacking, we just suck at working together and have allowed them to gain waaaay too much ground.

          They’re always going to be on the bus, but we can at least push them to the back where they can’t fuck with where we want to go.

        • Cowbee [he/they]
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you just need equal power and more horizontal structures, nothing to abuse then.

  • catsup@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    OK, so propose a system that’s actually been used at scale before that doesn’t have the same issues as capitalism. I’m all ears

    • GrayoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lmao, The fact that something hasnt been used at scale doesn’t mean it isn’t feasible.

        • GrayoxOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          By your logic humanity should never try anything that hasn’t been done before and be stuck in the stone age, cope harder bahahaha

  • boatsnhos931@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    …were you going to suggest a solution or are we going to finger our assholes all and do what ifs… what if I was a princess in faraway land? ☺️

    • Cowbee [he/they]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe we should share tools, so people can’t use ownership as power to oppress others. Just a thought

    • jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah you’re right lets build more spikes and anti-human architecture in the cities, solves the homeless problem right?

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait I’m confused. You’re upset that somebody brought up a problem without a solution, and you’re upset about the idea of possible solutions to this problem.

      Seems like you just don’t want to talk about this particular problem and have a traumatizing history of failing to convince people to not talk about it or the solutions.

      Sounds like weak baby shit to me.

        • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          “are we going to finger our assholes”

          Most people don’t talk like this when they are emotionally neutral. Are you telling me you’re not upset?

          • boatsnhos931@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m telling you I’m not upset, you just aren’t used to someone being direct and coarse. Anyone can list all the problems with the world and spend their life complaining about them. It’s just pointless unless you have ideas to help and I’ve upvoted those posters who did have ideas. Now go clean your vag out and stfu biotch ;)

            • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Na, you are a whiny little removed and you know it ;)

              You can dish it, but you can’t take it. You could have simply denied my claim that you aren’t interested in talking about the problem/solutions. But instead your “direct” dumb ass played the “Who’s upset?” game.

              I do appreciate the willingness to hear possible solutions problem though. I think your frustrations with what ifs are valid.

              Sorry about getting uppity, but your initial post sounded a lot like the kind of people who want to cause more suffering in the world by denying these problems exist. You got to put those people in their place, you know.

              • Semperverus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I honestly think you want or even need them to be upset so that your narrative can work.

                I talk like they do, i can tell you that its absolutely possible to be that blunt while being emotionally neutral.