Examples could be things like specific configuration defaults or general decision-making in leadership.

What would you change?

  • sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de
    1·
    10 months ago

    There where Times when Ubuntu was Marks baby, but nowadays with pro, advertisement and tracking in the terminal an AppStore, everything has to have a businesscase.

    I would recommend just plain Debian either with flatpak or in the testing branch. It’s almost the same, stable as a rock and driven by a community.

    • umbrella
      1·
      10 months ago

      if i understand correctly the testing branch is similar to ubuntu non-lts?

          • sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de
            1·
            10 months ago

            Yes it runs quite stable. But the packages and their configuration can change.

            If you’re looking for something more conservative, the stable branch fits better but on a desktop it’s very old (like an Ubuntu lts)

            • umbrella
              1·
              10 months ago

              thats precisely my problem with debian stable, but id be ok with testing if it doesnt break unpredictably with regular updates.

              • sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de
                1·
                10 months ago

                On my side it’s running since years without problems. I would never use arch on a business workstation with debian testing I see no problems at all.