Examples could be things like specific configuration defaults or general decision-making in leadership.

What would you change?

  • umbrella
    1·
    10 months ago

    if i understand correctly the testing branch is similar to ubuntu non-lts?

        • sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de
          1·
          10 months ago

          Yes it runs quite stable. But the packages and their configuration can change.

          If you’re looking for something more conservative, the stable branch fits better but on a desktop it’s very old (like an Ubuntu lts)

          • umbrella
            1·
            10 months ago

            thats precisely my problem with debian stable, but id be ok with testing if it doesnt break unpredictably with regular updates.

            • sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de
              1·
              10 months ago

              On my side it’s running since years without problems. I would never use arch on a business workstation with debian testing I see no problems at all.