• hglman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s a 5-day old article; Lemmy loves those on Sunday.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lemmy (like its predecessors) is temporally arranged content. Think of it like having a discussion in a pub. Imagine bringing up a topic and someone said: but we discussed this 5 days ago, so we cannot discuss it now. Your obvious response would be: but I wasn’t here five days ago. It’s okay to repeat a conversation.

      If you want more of a hierarchical structure, use wikipedia article conversations. Then each conversation only occurs once (ish). Not encouraging repeated conversation here will lead to slow content death – like on StackOverflow.

      • hglman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It also involves context; the post I replied to said it was not new. I simply noted that it occurred on slower days. My point being, you should check the dates of the source material for context. I made no judgment of the validity of that. You projected that. I agree with you It’s fine to visit the past.