I know that a lot of what Nix does is working around its break from FHS, but I can imagine there are still things that seep through. Are there any unsolvable problems due to this?

I saw on this post that it is possible to use FHS on Nix. Does this solve all potential issues then?

  • matcha_addict@lemy.lolOP
    1·
    5 months ago

    So that means packaging software for nix is a pain, compared to, say, gentoo or arch’s AUR, but only for a small subset of packages.

    I’ll keep this in mind as I’m exploring if I should switch from Gentoo.

    • hackeryarn@lemmy.world
      7·
      5 months ago

      I would say it’s actually easier in many cases. Nix has really fantastic packaging tooling. You do have to learn a bit of the nix language, however (not become an expert).

      The issue comes when trying to build from source. In most other distros, ou just follow the readme. In nix, you have to package it.

      • matcha_addict@lemy.lolOP
        1·
        5 months ago

        If I am packaging software for gentoo, all I have to do is translate the build instructions from the project’s documentation to gentoo’s package recipe. In nix, it seems that it is not that simple and you’ll have to do some exploration. Am I wrong?

        • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
          3·
          5 months ago

          It’s just that most (if not all) build system in the source code package would assume some level of FHS compliance.

          For example, they would install:

          • executables under /bin /usr/bin
          • libraries under /lib or /usr/lib
          • sysconfigs under /etc
          • manpages under /usr/share/man
          • and so on…

          These build systems would include options to change these, but you’d then have to change all these values to adapt to nix structure. While it’s all been done by the nix package maintainers, you’d have to do all that if you’re to come up with a new package.

          In the FHS compliant distros, the maintainers wouldn’t need to change anything since these values are already set to the values they want (there are actually minor details they’d change, but that’s another topic).

        • Atemu
          2·
          5 months ago

          If I am packaging software for gentoo, all I have to do is translate the build instructions from the project’s documentation to gentoo’s package recipe.

          It’s the same for Nixpkgs.

          In nix, it seems that it is not that simple and you’ll have to do some exploration. Am I wrong?

          In well behaved build systems, it’s likely easier to package than most other distros. If it’s not as well behaved you will have to do some “exploration” and the complexity can get quite out of control if the build system is exceptionally terrible.

          Here is the package for the GNU hello program which uses a well-behaved build system:

          https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/94b11073db6a7ca5733bc2d45378d800d9542975/pkgs/by-name/he/hello/package.nix

          If you ignore the optional passthru.tests, this is very simple. You provide metadata, sources etc. to the generic mkDerivation function and that’s it. The most complex non-standard thing this derivation does is enable the build system’s tests.

          You don’t even need to run the provided build instructions because Nixpkgs’ stdenv abstracts those away. If it finds a makefile, it’ll automatically run make and make install with the correct flags for instance. Same for other standard build systems; if you pass cmake into nativeBuildInputs, it’ll attempt to build, install, check etc. using cmake’s standardised interfaces.

          If the build system is poorly behaved however (like for instance Anki’s), you will have to get into the weeds and do some rather advanced things:

          https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/94b11073db6a7ca5733bc2d45378d800d9542975/pkgs/games/anki/default.nix

          Luckily though, most packages aren’t like this.