As car engines are getting cleaner and tyres wider and softer, pollution from tyres is already as high as pollution from engines. But:
Levels of nitrogen oxides, byproducts of burning gasoline and diesel that cause smog, asthma and other ailments, have fallen sharply as electric vehicle ownership has risen.
But there is still a problem where the rubber meets the road. Oslo’s air has unhealthy levels of microscopic particles generated partly by the abrasion of tires and asphalt. Electric vehicles, which account for about one-third of the registered vehicles in the city but a higher proportion of traffic, may even aggravate that problem.
“They’re really a lot heavier than internal combustion engine cars, and that means that they are causing more abrasion,” said Mr. Wolf, who, like many Oslo residents, prefers to get around by bicycle.
Your link doesn’t address this point. It doesn’t anywhere mention tyre pollution due to increased weight.
And all those bicycles! So much rubber polution!
On that note, this is some exciting technology that’s coming that’ll help reduce rubber pollution from all sources:
Airless bicycle tyres? I don’t see the connection.
Electric cars were never the solution. Public transit, shorter commutes, telework , liveable cities and neighborhoods with all the essentials at walking distance is what we need. And if your particular life circumstances force you to have a car, either keep what you already have or if you need to buy one, buy a small EV. There’s nothing green about a giant Tesla.
yes. this is what most people don’t understand.
even if you build a giant metro network, you can have worse congestion and pollution than ever. many cities have exactly this problem.
the only solution is increasing the housing (and reducing vacancy) in business districts, and providing more work places in residential districts. commuting distances have to drop to within cycling/walking distance.
But three is money to be made by making the problems bigger.
