OSS-Blacklist
codeberg.org
A list of companies that are hostile towards the open source community

Just saw the discussion around the Haier Home Assistant takedown and thought it would be good to materialize the metaphorical blacklist.

  • qaz@lemmy.worldOP
    16·
    10 months ago

    FSF defines anything that’s not copyleft as hostile. That’s most companies. I personally don’t think I can tell my users what to do with my software other than remove my liability so I vehemently disagree with Stallman.

    I’m not planning on counting that as hostile behavior. Organizations can choose a license for their software (and I can choose not to buy/use it). This collection is mostly focused on companies that hurt existing Open Source software. Such as sending a cease and desist to an unofficial plugin/extension or closing down software that was originally open source.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      5·
      10 months ago

      Maybe your could also add organisations (companies, government agencies, NGOs,…) that create standards in such a way that the standard is hard or impossible to implement in open source implementations?

      • ResoluteCatnapEnglish
        11·
        10 months ago

        I.e reddit raising API costs high enough that it effectively killed it.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          6·
          10 months ago

          I was more thinking about things like governments that decide that every implementation of something must be certified to be used, e.g. with wireless technologies. Not so much implementation as specification or legal compliance barriers to open source basically.

          You raise a good point though, financial barriers such as per user pricing that are hard to implement for software distributed for free would be quite similar.