At least eight people have been diagnosed with measles in an outbreak that started last month in the Philadelphia area. The most recent two cases were confirmed on Monday.

The outbreak began after a child who’d recently spent time in another country was admitted to the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) with an infection, which was subsequently identified as measles. The Philadelphia Department of Public Health considers the case to be “imported” but did not say from where.

The disease then spread to three other people at CHOP, two of whom were already hospitalized there for other reasons.

Two of those infected at the hospital were a parent and child. The child had not been vaccinated and the parent was offered medication usually given to unvaccinated people that can prevent infection after exposure to measles, but refused it, the Philadelphia Inquirer first reported.

Despite quarantine instructions, the child was sent to day care on Dec. 20 and 21, the health department said.

  • EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    171
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t this criminal negligence?

    Being told by a medical professional to quarantine and wantonly ignoring it is a lot like your mechanic telling you not to drive a car and you doing it anyway.

    I don’t see why the family shouldn’t be held to account for every single infection they started by sending their kid to day care.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except who will arrest them? The cops won’t enforce mask or quarantine mandates. COVID fucked all that up.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If the government truly wants to enforce a quarantine, they can. Remember when the Ebola scare was a thing? I know someone who was caught up in that; They were required to do thrice daily temperature checks, and the CDC would randomly call a landline they set up, around ten times a day. On those calls, they had to report any potential symptoms for every single person in the household. The CDC made it very clear that if they didn’t answer the phone, the feds were coming inside with hazmat gear to verify they hadn’t snuck out. It was basically house arrest without the ankle monitors.

      They had to have a very awkward conversation with their boss about it, because they were working as a lowly retail worker at the time. It was basically “hey uhh… You’ve seen the Ebola stuff in the news right? Yeah, I won’t be able to come in for a little while, because the feds say I’ll be arrested if I leave my house.”

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its tempting to rail against these parents but for the daycare part specifically let us not forget that people in America don’t get free healthcare, and we dont get paid sick days. You take your kid to daycare not because you fucking want to, your American boss doesn’t give a shit about your problems, he needs you in right now or you’re looking for another way to feed your kids

      • Null User Object@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, but in this specific case,

        The child had not been vaccinated and the parent was offered medication usually given to unvaccinated people that can prevent infection after exposure to measles, but refused it, the Philadelphia Inquirer first reported.

        This parent strongly deserves a good railing against.

  • Jerb322@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    1 year ago

    Will the family of the child face any consequences? I’d be very angry if my son was infected and they knew all along. Like looking for revenge angry!

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      118
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The part where the parent refused medication that can prevent infection is awful too. Can you imagine being so against medicine that you both risk your child’s life and risk leaving your child without a parent?

      • Granite@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They believe in medicine to some degree if they were already at the hospital.

        Edit: like those covidiots who only went in after the horse dewormer failed

        • mars296@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I don’t understand why they would go to the hospital and then not accept the treatment. For a diagnosis? How can they trust the diagnosis if they don’t trust the treatment?

          • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            In the case of COVID at least, they went because they were literally drowning in their own mucus and didn’t have a choice. They only started refusing things when they woke up enough to be delusional again.

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Some went, only for that reasons.

              Others got real scared and “repented” and cried and said it was awful and the worst thing they’d ever encountered and they hoped no one else would ever get it and they were fucking dying and sadness.

              Then some died.

              Some got better. Of the ones that got better, some genuinely learned something. Others, like Trump, continued to spew hateful, stupid shit despite realizing it sucked. Others learned absolutely nothing. I’m not sure which is worse.

            • mars296@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not according to the article: "The outbreak began after a child who’d recently spent time in another country was admitted to the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) with an infection, which was subsequently identified as measles. "

              • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes according to the article:

                The disease then spread to three other people at CHOP, two of whom were already hospitalized there for other reasons.
                Two of those infected at the hospital were a parent and child. The child had not been vaccinated and the parent was offered medication usually given to unvaccinated people that can prevent infection after exposure to measles, but refused it, the Philadelphia Inquirer first reported.

                Emphasis mine.

                • mars296@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah you’re right. I was confused and thought that it was the same parent who brought the first child in that refused the medication for themselves.

    • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At the very least CPS better be involved. I would definitely hope they take your child away if you’d risk your health, the child’s health, and the health of other children like that.

  • prole@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The disease then spread to three other people at CHOP, two of whom were already hospitalized there for other reasons.

    Two of those infected at the hospital were a parent and child. The child had not been vaccinated and the parent was offered medication usually given to unvaccinated people that can prevent infection after exposure to measles, but refused it, the Philadelphia Inquirer first reported.

    Despite quarantine instructions, the child was sent to day care on Dec. 20 and 21, the health department said.v

    It’s shocking how far backwards we’ve gone with respect to basic science… When I was a kid, vaccines were a given. Nobody ever batted an eye.

    Fuck Andrew Wakefield.

    • cooljacob204@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      1 year ago

      They should arrest the parents for negligence at this point. If any of the kids die they should get man slaughter charges.

      • Lavitz@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. They should be charged. Adults and unborn fetuses have more rights than children do. A woman can miscarry and get charged with abuse of a corpse, if I drink and drive and kill someone I go to jail but if I choose not to vaccinate my child and the child dies I get a pass?

        • cooljacob204@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I agree but these assholes went beyond that and sent their sick kid with measles to daycare when they were explicitly told to quarantine. Like what the absolute fuck. It’s beyond words how selfish and disgusting their actions are.

      • GluWu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t see how this already doesn’t amount to criminal negligence.

      • Raxiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if no one dies, anyone financially harmed by their actions, be it the daycare or families of potentially exposed children should be able to sue this moron for their losses. Freedom of choice isn’t freedom from consequence

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are legitimate medical conditions where you’re not supposed to give the vaccine, some temporarily, some permanently. Given that the kid was a patient at CHoP, I’m inclined the give them the benefit of the doubt. I’m not excusing the parent for not getting the medication, nor for sending the kid to daycare, but I’m going to give the kid the benefit of the doubt on receiving the vaccine. [I suspect I’m wrong to do so, but am doing so nonetheless.]

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sending a child with a highly infectious disease that is as dangerous and potentially deadly as measles into a day care should be held accountable. This is reckless endangerment of other peoples’ lives.

    • TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      The parents and the child were unvaccinated and the parents refused medication. I’d hazard a guess that they’re on that anti-vax esoteric shit.

      • ipkpjersi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hopefully DCFS can investigate them then. They are endangering not just the lives of their own child but others too. I would be livid if I was a parent and these idiots got my kid sick.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. It would be nice if people weren’t so pressured to go to work for money that they could take care of children rather than feeling like you need to abandon them for a job. I’m not saying they did this. But over 3/4 of my sick days last year was to take of my kid. And when I had COVID, I was out and the statutes to pay me were gone.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Poor Americans. I just can’t imagine having to deal with limited sick days. If I’m sick for more than six weeks in a row, I get a little less money, and then from my health insurance instead of my boss, but that’s the only limit that is.

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is why it’s very important to think fiscally when deciding to have a baby. Those things are damn pricy!

        • SapphironZA@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s also very important to vote carefully before deciding to have a baby. In most 1st world countries, you get a few family responsibilities leave days a year, that an employer cannot deny.

          Under law in those countries, you are a parent first and an employee second. That comes with privileges and responsibilities.

          • YeetPics@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Trying to understand how this is good advice…

            If my votes don’t get the politicians I like into office don’t reproduce?

            If I get pregnant move to a country that has better maternity benefits?

            • SapphironZA@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              What I meant, is that if you plan to have kids, you may want to vote for politicians that will give your children the best future, even after they are born.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    If any subsequent children die due to this outbreak, charge the parents that sent the sick child to daycare with murder.

      • athos77@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t excuse the parent for refusing the medication for themselves, however since the kid was a patient at CHoP, it’s possible they have an illness that prevents them from getting the vaccine. I’m not excusing the parent, but there’s a case to be made for the kid.

        • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If the parent refused medication for a disease that they were willing but unable to vaccinate the child against, that would be baffling. I can’t feasibly believe that this isn’t a belligerent, poorly informed parent being a reckless arsehole.

        • Crikeste@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fuck. If they were immunocompromised to begin with, the parents should also be arrested for endangering their child, after they’re charged with murder for any kids that died via their reckless actions.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      This should just generally be the case with vaccine refusal. If you refuse a vaccine and kill someone, that should be manslaughter

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately, it’s difficult to prove, but I generally agree. I’d love mandatory vaccinations, particularly at school, so idiot parents didn’t spread communicable diseases through their defenseless children. Especially since those parents got all theirs, so they are basically just endangering the lives of their kids and their immunocompomised neighbors.

    • slurpeesoforion@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Regardless of if anyone dies, they put others at risk by not quarantining. I don’t view this as any different than waving a gun around in public. They should be prosecuted for endangering others.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ooof, they got the expensive disease. Measles ruins your immune system, which takes ages to rebuild. In a British study studying religious antivaxxers vs vaccinated children, there was a much higher cost incurred per child for years, lol. They got a lot sicker a lot more often and needed more prescriptions because of what measles did to them.

    Measles is crazy infectious too, it’s basically like the Flood pathogen from Halo. Getting it in your brain really bumps up chances of dying. Luckily the MMR vaccine gives you lifelong immunity, especially with two shots. So it’s mostly just an anti-vaxxer penalty these days. Too bad we almost eliminated it if not for them.

    https://youtu.be/y0opgc1WoS4?si=RP7W1uainbdzKc6m

    • flicker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually had measles as a kid. My parents hadn’t gotten me vaccinated when they were supposed to not out of any antivaxx nonsense but regular old neglect.

      Lemme tell you. Whoever catches it? Highly unlikely they’ll be antivaxx after that. Measles is probably the worst thing that ever happened to me and it’s the reason I was the first in line every time I was eligible for a covid vaccine. Me and the old ladies who remembered polio needed absolutely zero convincing.

    • ██████████@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      its nit expensive if you just die 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 probably why that lady refused that $500,000antimeaseles injection.

      mam we was here for our wekkly emergency insulin shot or sum sun crap

      nurses have heard it all

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, these selfish assholes have always been there. They’re just more visible with cameras and phones everywhere, and outrage-based news seeks these kinds of stories out.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, Trump emboldened them, but the point is they were always there and always self-centered assholes.

          They just used to do the shittalking behind peoples’ backs.

  • blazeknave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can we deport these deplorables yet? They’re uncivilized and a burden on the tax payer funded system.

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe, but a lot of people go to work when slightly sick despite their company having a good policy.

      • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is true. You can still hear people on the news saying that we should have just ingnored the original strain of Covid and overrun the hospitals. Who gives a shit if a bunch of old people and immune compromised people died?

        However, if you have a jackass working for you, you have to tell them to stay home and not take down the entire department.

      • PorkRoll@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s a bit of a cultural problem, isn’t it? In capitalist America, staying healthy is unAmerican.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Getting an MMR vaccine or two will save you loads of sick time. Sick time policies are shitty, yes. But this is a two shot series that is good for life. There’s very little excuse, especially if they can afford daycare.

  • batmaniam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know this isn’t the point, but I’ll never get over that something as big and expensive as world class hospital could be built and they named it “chop”. No one said anything?

  • Captain Howdy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah it sucks the family ignored the quarantine orders, I agree. Maybe they should be held liable for that.

    What concerns me more, and what we should be talking about, is that the kid shows up at the hospital and two other patients contact the disease. At the hospital.

    Being at a hospital should not be a threat to ones health. This along with other hospital borne illness and the insane amount of preventable deaths from medical negligence should concern all of us.

    • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Measles is incredibly infectious, it’s why we eradicated it in the first place. Plus there are rules to follow in a hospital waiting room specifically designed to avoid that.

      But it relies on people actually following rules, and we can assume someone that didn’t vaccinate or follow quarantine procedure is not a big fan of following “meaningless” rules. And meaningless to them is any rule they don’t understand. Unfortunately they actively try to understand as little as possible so no one can accuse them of being the very scariest word to them right now, “woke”.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Waiting rooms are the worst. I’m so glad we finally have the technology to allow us to check in from home and completely avoid waiting rooms.

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s likely that this was probably an ER visit. That means they still would’ve had to wait in the ER waiting room in order of importance.

        The ER staff make educated guesses of how important it is someone gets seen right now based on reported symptoms, reported recent travels, temperature, etc… Then people get seen in order from (for lack of a better phrase) most likely to die right now to least likely. Sometimes, the ER waiting room staff get it wrong, sometimes the patient isn’t entirely honest, and sometimes symptoms unexpectedly worsen or change while the patient is in the waiting room.

        Another scenario: if this wasn’t an ER visit but instead a scheduled hospital visit, they likely still would’ve had to wait. They could probably fill out the required forms online, but they probably still would’ve had to wait until a doctor was actually available to see them, which could take a while. Doctors are almost never on time for appointments, mainly because they can only roughly estimate how long each appointment will actually take, and that’s arguably more true for hospitals than it is for your normal neighborhood doctor.

        All that to say that, unfortunately, hospital waiting rooms typically aren’t very avoidable.

        • The Pantser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          My local US Hospital has check in online for ER visits and then wait in car to be told to come in. You can’t always do that if you get brought in a ambulance but for a broken arm or leg you can check in online and wait in your car.

          • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah, that’s different from what I was thinking of, which was filling out the paperwork ahead of time online and then going in for your appointment on the day of.

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not without a total overhaul of the intake process and a redesign of the necessary infrastructure, at least. Controlled access, keeping patients separate, delays to change the air and sanitize each room before a new patient is admitted, etcetera.

          It sounds both practical and doable to me, but also expensive.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      It sounds like it wasn’t obvious the first child had measles when they were admitted. The initial symptoms don’t include the rash. Measles is uncommon here, and it’s ludicrously infectious, well above flu or most other similar-appearing diseases.

      https://www.cdc.gov/measles/symptoms/signs-symptoms.html

      It also sounds like, as soon as they realized, the hospital tried to prevent the spread by giving medication to those exposed. This parent refused it.

    • EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being at a hospital should not be a threat to ones health.

      Being in a place where sick people are is a threat to your health. Sick people go to the hospital. What do you think the hospital is for?

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I ask that you rethink this direction.

      Hospitals, and people who are trying to save lives, should not be held responsible for the negligence of the ignorant few.

      They spend a lot of time, money, and training on preventing Hospital Acquired ID, but they can only prevent so much. Sometimes it’s due to negligence, but they can’t restrain a child in a waiting room, they can’t stop 100℅ of spread. Without knowing the facts of the case (which they are surely reviewing), please don’t jump to blame.

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t blame the hospitals themselves so much as the tradition of waiting room triage.

        We shouldn’t be concentrating a bunch of potentially-contaigous inpatients together at all, but remodeling the infrastructure to design around a more sterile intake process would be expensive.

    • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Contrary to popular belief, the hospital is not a completely sanitary place.

      Rather, it’s a place they try their absolute hardest to keep as sanitary as possible because they don’t want the healthy people (doctors, nurses, visitors, etc.) to get sick and because they don’t want the sick people (patients) to get even more sick.

      Germs can unfortunately slip through the cracks even if every procedure is followed to the letter. There are times where they break procedure either on purpose or by accident (and doctors and hospitals can be put on the hook, legally, for those times), but this doesn’t seem to be one of those times given what we know right now.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The R naught (how many people a disease spreads to per infected person) on measles is insane; the average infected person can spread it to 12-18 people (source https://www.sciencenews.org/article/one-number-can-help-explain-why-measles-so-contagious)

      Covid is like 1.2- 1.4 people per infected person. It left 1,000,000 Americans dead, which is about 416 Pearl Harbors or 333 9/11s.

      The Spanish flu of 1918 killed multiple millions and, if memory serves, had an R naught of 2-3. Basically, our underfunded hospitals stand no chance against something so unbelievably infectious. Thank God we have a vaccine for it.

  • من البحر إلى النهر@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s a lot that could be better about my home country, such as the weather, but I am thankful for mandatory vaccinations. I know many of my stupid relatives who wouldn’t have gotten their vaccine if it wasn’t mandated.

    Some things shouldn’t be left to the “wisdom of the masses”.