• @Belaptir
    link
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • @poVoq
      link
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • @DPUGT
      link
      02 years ago

      mean… we’re a social species. We’ve evolved to live in systems called societies.

      Sure, if you want to stretch the definition to meaningless. I named my house “society” therefor I live in one too!

      Why do you consider you live better in the us then? And with such hate towards other people

      I don’t. There are things I have to work around even in the US, if I moved, there would be different thins to work around. The US has fewer of these than some places, but not substantially more than other places.

      I don’t hate anyone. Hatred is a peculiar emotion that I have felt in the past, directed towards specific individuals (low count). I hold no hatred towards any group of people, whatever the manner of grouping.

      I mostly have indifference for humans in general. I make exceptions for people I like. As for public school teachers, even the ones who were cruel or didn’t give a shit to me personally… how can I blame them? My mother didn’t do anything about it, kept sending me back. If someone should have done something, surely it was her don’t you think? But public school teachers continue to behave stupidly, continue to make poor life choices (their career, in case that’s obvious), and will even scuttle around on the ground picking up dollar bills like an over-aged stripper at the nudie bar.

      If they are humiliated, how is it anything other than they doing this to themselves?

      About Europe, the fertility rate is not very different from the US.

      Anything below replacement is eventual extinction. And it’s so far below that that it’s absurd. Children growing up seeing everyone around them have one child, or none at all… they internalize it, think it’s normal. Then they grow up to have one or none themselves. Which math says means it goes even lower since the ceiling was set but not the floor. Sure, you can pretend that some day 80 years from now one of those little girls will wake up and say “I want to grow up and have 2.1 children!”… but it really has to be all little girls who say that. If it’s just one in 10, then those girls have to say “I want to grow up and have 21 children!”. Neither of those is plausible.

      Dead. The US might be too. Certainly heading that way. Wouldn’t that be a hoot?

      you’re as dead as

      I don’t identify as my country though, unlike yourself. You see yourself as a citizen of X, one of many, collectively acting like some gigantic robot made out of people. One that can die even if some of the individuals survive. Me? I’m just me. My existence in this country is an accident of geography.

      • @poVoq
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • @DPUGT
          link
          02 years ago

          Your argument has one glaring logical error: The overall population of Europe is growing

          Yes. One of us has a glaring logical error. It is not me. Populations can (temporarily) grow, even as the fertility rate goes below replacement. Just as a car that runs out of gas can coast along for awhile on momentum. Sitting in the passenger seat, you taunt me with “I’ve invented perpetual motion”. I just smile and nod.

          Yes, this is due to immigration

          Those countries the people come from… what’s happening to their fertility rates? Aren’t those declining? Are the rates of decline decreasing or increasing? Do you see any evidence of it bottoming out at all? Will it bottom out at 2.1, or go lower?

          They have the same problem you do. You just have a head start.

          this is no problem at all

          This is laughable. I am not a racist. Assume each immigrant magically integrates instantly and perfectly… you’ll just run out of them is the problem. Or, more accurately, the problem is that you’ll run out of them and that you’re somehow deluded enough to never notice that you’ll run out of them. The fertility rates are declining even in the countries where the immigrants come from, with no signs of slowing down at all. They’ll hit 2.1 and keep plummeting further. What will you do then?

          Or, if we want to dig deeper, you don’t even know why it’s falling. You bandy around sophistry like “when women are educated they have fewer children” and just leave it at that. You can’t explore the ideas, for some instinctive fear that you might discover double secret misogyny or something.

          Children internalize the norms they grow up with. Every immigrant child in Europe is internalizing your childlessness norms. You’re converting them to be like you in that regard, not just the other stuff, the positive “integration” stuff. And you’re converting them far faster than their great numbers can hope to overcome.

          In your collective psychology, there is something that makes you all feel as if you’re bad. So bad that you shouldn’t exist. And your wish will eventually come true. Personally I’m not surprised, it is the continent that gave us a century of world wars, pogroms, holocausts, and other villainous acts of barbarism. Maybe you guys have the right idea.

          Listen to the stuff being said to me in this thread. That I’m privileged and hateful. You want me to feel miserable with you. To be ashamed, embarrassed, and to change. Why would I want to become what you are?

          You’re already all dead. You just haven’t noticed yet.

          but at least it is mostly managed better then in the US

          No argument there. We should let in anyone who wants to be here… whether they want to stay and be citizens, or just stay awhile and go back home. Anyone smart enough to want to come here is an asset, and it’s sort of crazy that their home countries would let them leave. No strings, no gotchas… if they haven’t been convicted of a felony or have untreated tuberculosis, let them in. Bricklayer or PhD.

          • @poVoq
            link
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            • @DPUGT
              link
              02 years ago

              Uhmm, you realize the world population is nearly 8 billion people and still growing fast?

              Let’s imagine a simpler scenario, for those who might read our comments but are bad at math. We won’t use humans (too much baggage), but little aliens we’ll call zoops.

              Zoops have two biological sexes that procreate together. There are two specimens, a Y and a Z. They have two offspring, also Y and Z. The population has doubled, but the fertility rate is at exact replacement level. When the two older zoops die, there will be only two. Zoops have no incest taboos, and so the second generation procreates twice.

              In this way, the population has reached a steady state. But what if, instead, they only procreated once? This population is dead. Period. Sure, it will hang on a little longer, and sure, you’ll scream “but their population increased by 50% in just minutes” as some sort of lame argument that overpopulation is a concern. No, that was never a concern, instead extinction is the real risk.

              We are in the period where humans are just having the one offspring per two parents, and since the parents don’t immediately die, it looks to you as if the population is “still growing fast”.

              We will not run out of “them” anytime soon

              You will indeed run out of them within 25 years. Within your lifetime. This will be about the time that you personally are relying on them to be the nurse’s aids in your nursing homes and to wipe your geriatric ass.

              and even if we do at some point (far in the future) that is probably a good thing as the world is way over-populated as it is right now already.

              No one growing up in this world you imagine will think “ok, the population has fallen enough now it’s time to start having 2.1 children again”.

              You belong to a death cult. Suicidal at the species level.

              • @poVoq
                link
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator

                • @DPUGT
                  link
                  02 years ago

                  I don’t know where you get your figures from, but the global fertility rate is still above replacement level,

                  Only when including several regions where fertility remains high (mostly Africa). If those are excluded, it’s extinction-level. But hey, you say “that’s how averages work”.

                  So let’s look at Africa. Their fertility rate is above replacement, but is dropping rapidly. We can measure how fast it is dropping. We know approximately when it will fall below replacement levels. And we don’t see any reason why it should remain above them, when it didn’t remain above replacement (or even just at) anywhere else in the world. It’s natural, and even smart, to assume that the same sociological forces that made it drop elsewhere are those making it drop in Africa, and that they will work the same as elsewhere (since Africans are human like everyone else). It’d actually be sort of racist to assume that it would work differently there wouldn’t it?

                  Once we have considered the places it’s below replacement, and the places that it’s above replacement but dropping, where else is left at all? Nowhere.

                  You don’t even understand the phenomenon. You don’t want to understand it. And you’re claiming that somehow it’s not even happening. It’s bizarre.

                  Also even at a slightly below replacement rate (where the global fertility rate is heading indeed) it will take centuries

                  No. The effect actually picks up speed the longer it occurs. Children internalize norms. If the 5 children who see everyone around them childless (excepting their own parents who have one), then don’t grow up to have one child also, they’ll have on average 0.2 children or something like that. Each generation shrinks faster than the last.

                  And if that somehow still translates into “it will be centuries before the last centenarian dies!”… how is that a counter-argument at all?

                  • @poVoq
                    link
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    deleted by creator