@nutomicA to Fediverse • 2 months agoAnnouncing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternativeibis.wikimessage-square319arrow-up1555arrow-down139cross-posted to: solarpunk@slrpnk.nettechnology@hexbear.netfediverse@lemmy.worldibis
arrow-up1516arrow-down1external-linkAnnouncing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternativeibis.wiki@nutomicA to Fediverse • 2 months agomessage-square319cross-posted to: solarpunk@slrpnk.nettechnology@hexbear.netfediverse@lemmy.worldibis
minus-square@Rolder@reddthat.comlinkfedilink0•2 months agoI’ve never had issues with Wikipedia not at least mentioning a controversy on a topic if one exists. Got any current examples?
minus-square@brain_in_a_boxlink1•2 months ago I’ve never had issues with Wikipedia not at least mentioning a controversy on a topic if one exists. How would you know?
minus-square@Rolder@reddthat.comlinkfedilink0•2 months agoNever heard of any examples and certainly no one has provided any in this thread. Just been the usual muh western website is evil by default kind of stuff.
I’ve never had issues with Wikipedia not at least mentioning a controversy on a topic if one exists. Got any current examples?
How would you know?
Never heard of any examples and certainly no one has provided any in this thread. Just been the usual muh western website is evil by default kind of stuff.