• Christian
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Good luck with this project, hope to see it succeed.

      • CC@mamot.fr
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        @nutomic
        I would like to see some way to seed an article with previous collaborative work, as a starting point. Maybe, create an article and if the name exists on that other wiki encyclopedia site, then give the option to pull it.

        Also, please consider, (just consider, thanks) moving away from github.

    • Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Honestly I don’t think it really matters that much, because firstly you could just say the name of the instance instead, and secondly people have been complaining about the branding of everything to do with the fediverse since the very beginning. The simple fact is that even if you called it “Federated Wiki” or even “Fedipedia”, all that would really invite is the question of “wtf is federation” from the 99% of Wikipedia readers who have never heard of the fediverse before, then they get confused and scared off; or perhaps the name “Federated Wiki” would make them suspect that it’s a centralized wiki about something called “Federated”. Like, even Wikipedia itself has problems with branding because people keep thinking they’re connected with Wikileaks, people keep calling Wiktionary “Wikipedia”, or people keep abbreviating Wikipedia as “Wiki” even though capital-W Wiki is only supposed to refer to WikiWikiWeb / Ward’s Wiki.

      That said, if I were to name such a project, I would’ve probably gone for something with “nomicon” in it. “Librenomicon”, “Narodnomikon”, something like that… But nothing’s stopping these from being instance names, of course.