@wildcherry@slrpnk.net to Antiwork • 2 months agoEnergy efficiency of active travel (walking, cycling, ebike) compared to an electric carslrpnk.netimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up180arrow-down113file-textcross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.worldclimate@slrpnk.net
arrow-up167arrow-down1imageEnergy efficiency of active travel (walking, cycling, ebike) compared to an electric carslrpnk.net@wildcherry@slrpnk.net to Antiwork • 2 months agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.worldclimate@slrpnk.net
minus-square@delirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilink2•2 months agoPretty fucked up. Do actual energy efficiency (calories burned per km) and you’ll quickly see the bicycle is far above everything
minus-square@wildcherry@slrpnk.netOPlinkfedilink6•edit-22 months agoFrom a quick search: Cycling = 23kcal / km Tesla: 120kcal / km There was an article in cars magazine saying that cyclists were especially polluting. In teir study (in europe), the hypothetical cyclist was only eating Argentine beef lol. So no I do not swallow it.
Pretty fucked up. Do actual energy efficiency (calories burned per km) and you’ll quickly see the bicycle is far above everything
From a quick search:
There was an article in cars magazine saying that cyclists were especially polluting. In teir study (in europe), the hypothetical cyclist was only eating Argentine beef lol. So no I do not swallow it.