As a medical doctor I extensively use digital voice recorders to document my work. My secretary does the transcription. As a cost saving measure the process is soon intended to be replaced by AI-powered transcription, trained on each doctor’s voice. As I understand it the model created is not being stored locally and I have no control over it what so ever.

I see many dangers as the data model is trained on biometric data and possibly could be used to recreate my voice. Of course I understand that there probably are other recordings on the Internet of me, enough to recreate my voice, but that’s beside the point. Also the question is about educating them, not a legal one.

How do I present my case? I’m not willing to use a non local AI transcribing my voice. I don’t want to be percieved as a paranoid nut case. Preferravly I want my bosses and collegues to understand the privacy concerns and dangers of using a “cloud sollution”. Unfortunately thay are totally ignorant to the field of technology and the explanation/examples need to translate to the lay person.

  • FlappyBubbleOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    My question is not a legal one. There probably are legal obstacles for my hospital in this case but HIPAA is not applicable in my country.

    I’d primarily like to get your opinions of how to effectively present my case for my bosses against using a non local model for this.

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Look to your local health privacy laws. Most countries have that tightly controlled in such a way that this use of AI is illegal.

      Your question is not a legal one, but a legal argument can be a very persuasive one.