This was originally posted to lemmy.pineapplemachine.com: https://lemmy.pineapplemachine.com/post/5781

It has also been posted to lemmy.ca: https://lemmy.ca/post/591991


Lemmy is federated and decentralized and that means that we can all coexist regardless of our differing political opinions. I think it’s important to preface this by saying that I am not offended by or concerned with anyone’s politics, and I’m certainly not here to argue with anyone about them.

My concern is that users are being banned and content is being removed on lemmy.ml citing a rule that is not publicly stated anywhere that I have seen.

Moderators of lemmy.ml are removing posts and comments which are critical of the Chinese government and are banning their authors.

This came to my attention because of how lemmy user bans are federated just like everything else, and I was confused about why my instance had logged a lemmy.ml user ban citing “orientalism” as the reason for the ban.

Screenshot of my own instance’s modlog, as viewed by an admin

I noticed that the banned user had recently commented on a post in !worldnews@lemmy.ml that had been removed with the reason “Orientalist article”.

Screenshot of banned user’s history on lemmy.ml

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

Here’s the article that was removed, titled “China may face succession crisis”. It was published by axios.com, which mediabiasfactcheck describes as having “a slight to moderate liberal bias” and gives its second-highest ranking for factual reporting. The article writes unfavorably of Chinese President Xi Jinping.

https://www.axios.com/2023/06/06/china-may-face-succession-crisis

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/axios/

I had not remembered seeing anything in lemmy.ml’s rules that would suggest that “orientalism”—meaning, as I understand it, the depiction or discussion of Asian cultures by people in Western ones—was against the rules. So I checked, and I found that there was not. Not on the instance’s front page, and not in !worldnews@lemmy.ml.

Screenshot of instance rules for lemmy.ml

Screenshot of community rules for !worldnews@lemmy.ml

There is a stated rule against xenophobia, but I think that xenophobia is not widely understood to include Westerners writing critically of the actions of an Asian government.

This is where I went from confused to concerned.

Lemmy instances have public moderation logs, which I think is a very positive thing about the platform. So I looked more closely at lemmy.ml’s moderation log.

Please note that moderation logs are also federated. It’s hard to be 100% sure which instance a mod action is actually associated with, looking at these logs. The previously mentioned user ban and post removal were, I think, definitely actions taken by lemmy.ml moderators. My own instance’s mod log identifies the banning moderator as a lemmy.ml admin, and the removed post was submitted to a lemmy.ml community. I’ve done my best to verify that all of the following removals were really done by lemmy.ml moderators, but I can’t be absolutely certain. Please forgive me if any of them were actually made on other instances that do have an explicitly stated rule against orientalism.

Removed Comment Ah yes. Being against China’s racist genocide is racist. China, the imperialist ethno-state, is clearly innocent. by @CrimsonOnoscopy@beehaw.org reason: Orientalism

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

Removed Comment Lol. Thinking some countries have better governments than others is supremacist? Whatever, dude. By the way. If there are any countries with decent governments, I don’t know of them. But like. If there were decent countries, they wouldn’t behave like China. by @balerion@beehaw.org reason: Orientalism

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

These following moderator actions did not specifically cite orientalism, but did not seem to be breaking any of the instance’s or community’s explicitly stated rules.

Banned @0x815@feddit.de reason: Only makes anti russia and anti china, crosspostst from reddit. 2nd temp ban expires: 9d ago

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

Removed Comment Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia and Tibet are all Colonies of China, which it treats as Colonial Territories, by - Forcibly destroying the local culture. Forcefully extracting to harm of the locals. Genocide, abuse, kidnapping, rape. But there is no point in engaging to you. You are a liar. You know you are. When you deny genocides, you put yourself on the same side as the fascists and reactionaries of the past. by @CrimsonOnoscopy@beehaw.org reason: Rule 1 and 2

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

I have no affection for the Chinese government and I do not call myself a communist. I would not enforce a rule against orientalism on my own instance. But I think that lemmy.ml’s moderators are entitled to enforce whatever rules they please. It’s only that, as the largest single lemmy instance so far, I believe that they have an obligation to disclose these rules, and an obligation to not ban users or remove content for failing to follow unobvious and unstated rules.

I’d like to raise some awareness about this, and I’d like to openly ask the moderators of lemmy.ml to state the rules that they intend to enforce clearly and explicitly.

I will be very clear and state it again: I am not asking for anyone to change their opinions or to not enforce a rule that they believe in. That is the great thing about lemmy, that we can coexist in this federated community even when we don’t share the same opinions. What I am asking is for lemmy.ml’s rules to be clearly stated, because I think it does not reflect well on the broader community if the predominant instance moderates its users and content according to rules that are not being explicitly disclosed.

  • DessalinesA
    link
    English
    -311 months ago

    Do you know what the most common profession for members of the NPC, the national people’s congress, the main governing body of the PRC, is? Industrial engineer

    Guess what the most common profession is for liberal democracies? Lawyers.

    I don’t say this because I don’t like lawyers 🤣 , I have one in the family. I say it only to point out that most of what you’ve learned about China, is coming through a heavy media filter, from a media who only seeks to demonize a country they’re in a trade war with.

    • @abraxas
      link
      English
      38
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      In fairness, before I walked onto Tiananmen Square when visiting China, my local guide strongly implied that we should not mention anything but weddings or vacation spots (no massacre) if we didn’t want to be arrested.

      Being there was surreal and terrifying. Police with shotguns everywhere. The level of authoritative oppression is worse than visiting a small town in the South.

      The “heavy media filter” represents exactly what I experienced as a young&dumb tourist who didn’t know about any media filter in the first place.

      EDIT: More info. Every time I walked past banks, or any possibly-questionable spot… police/soldiers with shotguns. Sure it’s a culture difference, but I live in the most gun-friendly country in the world and their authorities walk around packing heavy weapons. And the complete lack of public protest was noticable and staggering. All I have to do in the US to see protest is drive down any highway. In China? Nothing.

      EDIT2: And hey. I’ve worked with dozens of Chinese expats. You know what they all have in common? They would never live in China again. Mostly because of how oppressive they feel the government is. A lot of coworkers were “rural Chinese” and were second-class citizens behind the “urban Chinese” (confirmed by expats from the latter who were friends/coworkers with the former). The former had a passport that excluded them from entering cities because they weren’t “good enough”. The latter had passports to go anywhere.

      • @gnuhaut
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I read about protests in China all the time.

        So I just skimmed English Wikipedia (hardly a neutral source), and they say:

        The number of annual protests has grown steadily since the early 1990s, from approximately 8,700 “mass group incidents” in 1993[1] to over 87,000 in 2005.[2] In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010.[3][4] Mass incidents are defined broadly as “planned or impromptu gathering that forms because of internal contradictions”, and can include public speeches or demonstrations, physical clashes, public airings of grievances, and other group behaviors that are seen as disrupting social stability.[5]

        This does not at all sound like there are no protests.

        • @abraxas
          link
          English
          11
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Your response is fair, but I want to clarify my point. It was not to say that China is a terrible country or that my personal experience covers every inch of the largest country in the world.

          It was to reject the idea that there is some “media heavy filter”. The media represents what its viewers would experience with zero media intervention by visiting Beijing, or Shamien. Or (from expats’ experience) hundreds of other parts of China.

          And as to that, I feel I was able to hit a bullseye with that point, that is not really influenced by your response regarding protests against or in China.

          Whatever filter the media is portraying is an accurate shapshot of the country, if not a complete one. I knew a single re-pat to China, and she was happy there. She could not, however, tell me that any of my concerns or experiences were invalid.

          EDIT: And with all due respect, I would like to point out to readers that your post history involves accusing the West of trying to use propaganda to make everyone hate China so we can go to war with them. We can all have the opinions we have, but I feel that is a bit tinfoil extreme and not merely a “voice of reason” response like you present here.

          If anything “this is what I saw when I was there” is a voice of “foreign reason” that can be taken or left.

          EDIT2: (Can’t stop editing). I’d like to reference you to a very wise person who said:

          “Do you expect people to waste their time debunking your shit when you’re not willing to form an argument other than “I read this somewhere trust me”?” His name? @gnuhaut

          • @SturgiesYrFase
            link
            English
            211 months ago

            Just wanted to point out, China is the fourth largest country in the world, behind Russia(1) Canada(2) and the USA(3)

            • @abraxas
              link
              English
              211 months ago

              Largest country by population :) But importantly, I think one could argue that China is culturally the largest country as well.

              That said, where do you find USA(3)? China comes in third for landmass here.

              • @TheAnonymouseJoker
                link
                English
                111 months ago

                India overtook China in terms of population numbers. Just wanted to correct that.

              • @SturgiesYrFase
                link
                English
                111 months ago

                Not gonna lie…Google, and my bad for just taking it on face value

                • @abraxas
                  link
                  English
                  311 months ago

                  As Mark Twain (or was it Ben Franklin?) once said: “There are lies, there are damned lies, and then there is Google”.

          • @gnuhaut
            link
            English
            -111 months ago

            So you cite me when I respond to a guy who just said he knows shit because he reads a lot and that’s it, when I responded to your comment with an actual source? Do you think that’s some great own?

            • @abraxas
              link
              English
              611 months ago

              I cited that you implied reading shit was not knowledge. Maybe it was a bit flippant of me, but you did quite literally try to invdalite my entire experience by quoting a random block of wikipedia about protests.

              But I’m not here to argue. I gave my own experience. I am ready to move on.

              • @gnuhaut
                link
                English
                3
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I implied just saying “I read a lot” is no way to bolster an argument.

                I also did not “invalidate your entire experience”. I just pointed out that your experience of not seeing protests might not be representative. I didn’t say anything about your other points.

        • ATGM 🚀
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -211 months ago

          There absolutely are protests in China, they happen, and this is a true fact. Until recently, it was broadly observed that such anger was directed generally at local officials and not at the CCP regime itself.

          Recently, though, protests asking the CCP regime to resign have been seen. Which previously was unprecedented.

          The fact that protests do happen and occasionally are tolerated in China does absolutely nothing to take away from the point that China is an authoritarian Police State. The Chinese Constitution is not respected within China.

          • @GarbageShootAlt2
            link
            English
            311 months ago

            The fact that protests do happen and occasionally are tolerated in China

            Literally just inventing statistics about protests being suppressed.

            During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.

            . . .What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.”

            – Some guy, emphasis mine

      • @BunkerBusterKeaton
        link
        English
        -911 months ago

        China has 1.4 billion people. Do you really think they have the ability and/or need to “squash” protests and prevent any protest from ever happening? No. They have a healthy democracy where people are involved in voicing their opinions, and protesting if it ever comes to that. Please stop ingesting so much xenophobic propaganda and learn more about the countries of which you speak

    • pineappleOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 months ago

      Do you know what the most common profession for members of the NPC, the national people’s congress, the main governing body of the PRC, is? Industrial engineer

      Guess what the most common profession is for liberal democracies? Lawyers.

      I don’t say this because I don’t like lawyers 🤣 , I have one in the family. I say it only to point out that most of what you’ve learned about China, is coming through a heavy media filter, from a media who only seeks to demonize a country they’re in a trade war with.

      I would like to step outside of the argument about people’s perceptions of China here, to point out that this is a matter of communication, not ideology. You have seen for yourself how there are commenters here who the rules were not clearly communicated to, because in their use of language they do not understand the terms bigotry or racism to include orientalism.

      This has been stated very succinctly in the comment that you responded to:

      Being critical of a totalitarian and Imperialist ethnostate - by which I mean the Chinese state - is not bigotry.

      Please step outside of the ideology of it and understand that this is not about whether orientalism can be considered bigotry. The issue is that if you list bigotry and racism without also explicitly listing orientalism, then there are people who will misunderstand and they will be upset when they are subject to rules that they don’t understand. You may persuade this one commenter, but you cannot persuade every unknown reader who happens upon lemmy.ml and sees the rules to assume that bigotry must include orientalism. You must speak to people in a language that they can understand, or there is no point in speaking at all.

      I am afraid that this misunderstanding is a big problem waiting to happen when a crowd of redditors—most of whom I think are very likely not to have the same understanding of the rules as written as you do—come to the platform, and then feel offended and surprised when they find themselves subject to rules that were not clearly communicated to them. It is important that people understand the rules that they are expected to follow.

      I am not asking that orientalism be included explicitly in the rules because of any ideological position on whether or not orientalism should be implied by the terms already there. I am asking because I think it is important that the rules be communicated in a way that people can understand, and the responses to this post are very clear evidence that people have not understood.

    • ATGM 🚀
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -511 months ago

      Actually, a lot of what I’ve learned about China comes from books written by Chinese people and scholars.

      Since you’re engaging with me, I’ll ask you.

      Is there a genocide in Xinjiang? I’m ready to hear your evasion and denials.

      • @gnuhaut
        link
        English
        7
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Do you expect people to waste their time debunking your shit when you’re not willing to form an argument other than “I read this somewhere trust me”?

      • DessalinesA
        link
        English
        511 months ago

        Most of the world disagrees with you, especially the middle east:

        Are what those countries saying untrustworthy?

        • @Link
          link
          English
          011 months ago

          I say it only to point out that most of what you’ve learned about China, is coming through a heavy media filter, from a media who only seeks to demonize a country they’re in a trade war with.

          Most of the world disagrees with you, especially the middle east

          China is an important and powerful trading partner to many countries, so there is an incentive not to speak up. If you are skeptical about the western media, I think you should also be skeptical about the stance of these governments.

          To me the situation in Xinjiang is very concerning because humanitarian organizations like Amnesty International speak out against the treatment of Uygurs. I think they don’t have a reason to turn a blind eye like many of these governments do. And quite a few of them don’t seem to be bothered by human rights violations, violating them themselves in horrific ways. Looking at you, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Syria etc.

          Again, I agree that the west has a political motive to slander China. And the west also does and has done horrible things. But I don’t think the same goes for humanitarian organizations.

          • DessalinesA
            link
            English
            1411 months ago

            A lot of these western “humanitarian / rights” orgs, came out of the cold war, as part of an active effort to carry out regime change against socialist states and stop the spread of communism. Amnesty international for example was co-founded by someone who worked for british intelligence, and its other founder had close links to the FBI, and even had a hand in the FBI killing of Fred Hampton.

            https://www.mintpressnews.com/amnesty-international-troubling-collaboration-with-uk-us-intelligence/253939/

            I trust what Muslim and global south countries, as well as the Uyghur people themselves have to say about their treatment, and not these western “human-rights-complex” orgs hailing from countries who have done nothing but bomb the middle east for 60+ years.

            • 7heo
              link
              English
              3
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              expired

              • @DengueDucky
                link
                English
                411 months ago

                I think you’re being downvoted because the general belief here is that reeducation isn’t happening and that there is no solid evidence that it is. I’m also not very knowledgeable here though, so take this with a grain of salt.

                • 7heo
                  link
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  expired

                  • @GarbageShootAlt2
                    link
                    English
                    -311 months ago

                    The downvotes are from you seemingly maliciously misinterpreting the point, specifically that it was the people in re-education that are glad they are there and not what was actually said, that the global Muslim population seems to largely support the re-education. By its very nature, we would expect very few people to be glad they are there – especially while they are there – but we would expect many Uighurs in the region to be glad that those people are re-educated, as the broader population of Uighurs in the region are the main group victimized by the many terrorist attacks that this crackdown was in response to. That is to say nothing of what Muslims elsewhere in the world think and why because I don’t understand that topic enough.

                • 7heo
                  link
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  expired

        • @Outsider7542
          link
          English
          -3
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          A map like that isn’t really reflective of any substance. Do you know what most maps of the US look like when defining political opinions by states? It’s a sea of red. But it clearly doesn’t tell a valid picture of popular support. And I’m not even arguing that makes any particular opinion more valid or not, all I’m saying is that its very easily misleading depending on what narrative you want to sell.

          https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/E7LSY66ODVCFHEVJ7TTGJKPHSU.jpg

          Clearly the vast majority of the country supported Trump based on that map…Except that’s not true.

          • @TheAnonymouseJoker
            link
            English
            1111 months ago

            Are you dismissing information about plight of Uyghur Muslims even though Muslim countries of the world found no issue with it? How does majority of the world support Trump with that map, and why are you distorting and misrepresenting information to armtwist the narrativr?

            • @Outsider7542
              link
              English
              -311 months ago

              Are you being inflammatory and intentionally framing my post to make it seem like I made statements that I didn’t make? What I refuted is that posting a simple map that appears to tell a definitive story isn’t actually very substantial because there are many ways in which it can be misleading.

              Let’s first address the most obvious error in your comment. You said that I claimed “majority of the world support trump with that map”, and my comment clearly says “country”, not world.

              My point is that placing colors on a map can mean anything depending on how you frame the context or what you understand about what geographically is being depicted in the map. I used a map of the US as an example of how colors on a map can be misleading. The vast majority of that map is red, which would lead you to believe that in a lens where red/blue represent two different political parties, would have you believe the red party has drastically more support than the blue party.

              Now that is one way that a map with simplistic information shown can be misleading, but there are other ways to use them to be misleading. For example, the very map that Dessalines posts, why is it that nearly all the Western countries are unified in a certain perspective of China? Are you going to say because of US influence? It would be fair to refute that a bunch of independent developed Western nations have each come to a similar conclusion about China if you claimed that there was a lack of independence to them coming to that conclusion. At the same time, couldn’t that argument also be made about China and other nations within the sphere of influence of China?

              Also you’re using a fallacious defense that Muslim countries are somehow more authoritative in source because the alleged victims of abuse are Muslim, as though no collective of people have ever hurt people that have identified similarly of that collective before. Wasn’t there violence between different denominations of Christians? Isn’t there violence between different beliefs among Muslims? There’s a laundry list of abuses humans have committed against each other and against people that identify similar to each other, and it’s often because there ends up being a deep difference of opinion on specific issues. So generalizing that all Muslim countries will support all Muslims in all cases is bigotry on your part.