if you could pick a standard format for a purpose what would it be and why?

e.g. flac for lossless audio because…

(yes you can add new categories)

summary:

  1. photos .jxl
  2. open domain image data .exr
  3. videos .av1
  4. lossless audio .flac
  5. lossy audio .opus
  6. subtitles srt/ass
  7. fonts .otf
  8. container mkv (doesnt contain .jxl)
  9. plain text utf-8 (many also say markup but disagree on the implementation)
  10. documents .odt
  11. archive files (this one is causing a bloodbath so i picked randomly) .tar.zst
  12. configuration files toml
  13. typesetting typst
  14. interchange format .ora
  15. models .gltf / .glb
  16. daw session files .dawproject
  17. otdr measurement results .xml
  • morrowind
    1·
    1 year ago

    I’d argue asciidoc is better, but less well known

    • Lemmy@iusearchlinux.fyi
      1·
      1 year ago

      asciidoc lost me because it’s not a markdown superset. Why invent yet another way of marking headlines?

      Also GitLab/Hub markdown is the standard and I don’t think we need another.

      • morrowind
        1·
        1 year ago

        That’s a weird way of thinking. I could make the reverse argument.

        Markdown lost me because it’s not a subset to asciidoc, why invent yet another way of marking headlines?

        Also asciidoc is the standard and I don’t think we need another.

        This whole thread is discussing ideal standards.