“We believe the prerequisite for meaningful diplomacy and real peace is a stronger Ukraine, capable of deterring and defending against any future aggression,” Blinken said in a speech in Finland, which recently became NATO’s newest member and shares a long border with Russia.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
    link
    English
    -1111 months ago

    Pull out of the proxy war that US engineered and is currently fuelling. This war will be over as soon as US stops pouring billions into it.

    • DarraignTheSane
      link
      English
      911 months ago

      “Over” with Putin having gotten what he wants after killing millions of Ukrainians and still occupying their land. So no, fuck Putin and fuck anyone who supports his insane bloody quest for glory.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        link
        English
        -3
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        As Obama clearly explained years ago, there’s only one way this war can end:

        Obama declares Ukraine to be not a core American interest and that he is reluctant to intervene in the country, because Russia will always be able to maintain escalatory dominance there. “The fact is that Ukraine, which is a non-NATO country, is going to be vulnerable to military domination by Russia no matter what we do.”—President Obama

        The only question is how many people are going to die in the process. Fuck anybody who supports continuation of this war. All the west is doing is prolonging the suffering. In the end this will end the same way as every other noble adventure the west was involved in. It’s absolutely incredible to see that people are utterly incapable of learning from prior experience.

        • DarraignTheSane
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          (edit) - Wow it’s only been like 24 hours since I’ve been on Lemmy and I’ve been in arguments with and been down voted by tankies and fascist supporters.

          There were plenty of people back in the day that said the U.S. should stay out of Europe and the Pacific. That we should just let the Nazis and Japan do what they pleased. Those people were either cowards or traitors.

          In the end, it’s clear one country is the aggressor and must be stopped before they wipe out the other. Your argument boils down to “nah, fuck them Ukranians, let them die because Putin wants it”. Nope.

          It’s Putin’s war. He can end it when he likes by getting the fuck out of Ukraine.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
            link
            English
            311 months ago

            I recommend reading this book produced by US military, it makes it pretty clear that allies played a minor role in WW2. USSR was who defeated the nazis:

            a few quotes from it

            Meanwhile, calling this Putin’s war is an incredibly reductionist. The war is a result of tensions that were largely escalated by NATO, and plenty of experts in the west have been warning about this for many years now. Here’s what Chomsky has to say on the issue recently:

            https://truthout.org/articles/us-approach-to-ukraine-and-russia-has-left-the-domain-of-rational-discourse/

            https://truthout.org/articles/noam-chomsky-us-military-escalation-against-russia-would-have-no-victors/

            50 prominent foreign policy experts (former senators, military officers, diplomats, etc.) sent an open letter to Clinton outlining their opposition to NATO expansion back in 1997:

            George Kennan, arguably America's greatest ever foreign policy strategist, the architect of the U.S. cold war strategy warned that NATO expansion was a "tragic mistake" that ought to ultimately provoke a "bad reaction from Russia" back in 1998.

            Jack F. Matlock Jr., US Ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987-1991, warning in 1997 that NATO expansion was "the most profound strategic blunder, [encouraging] a chain of events that could produce the most serious security threat [...] since the Soviet Union collapsed"

            Academics, such as John Mearsheimer, gave talks explaining why NATO actions would ultimately lead to conflict this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4

            These and many other voices were marginalized, silenced, and ignored. Yet, now people are trying to rewrite history and pretend that Russia attacked Ukraine out of the blue and completely unprovoked.

            What’s going to happen in the end is that US is going to stop funding the coup regime in Ukraine just like they stopped propping up their puppet regimes in Vietnam and Afghanistan. This is likely to happen soon because election season is coming up, and Biden isn’t going to want to have this debacle hanging over him. At that point the war will be over. It’s absolutely stunning to see that grown ass adults can’t understand this.

            • DarraignTheSane
              link
              English
              -411 months ago

              Or, we’ll bolster Ukraine’s military until they kick the shit out of the pathetic remains of Russia, they’ll rise up and kill Putin, and then struggle for the next few decades to get out of the dark ages that Putin sent them back into.

              In the end I don’t really give a shit what a tankie bot account has to say, so have a day.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                link
                English
                -111 months ago

                Can’t wait to see what tune you’ll be singing next year when your regime abandons Ukraine.

                • borari
                  link
                  English
                  011 months ago

                  deleted by creator

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                    link
                    English
                    0
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    If by that you mean Ukraine losing a bunch of people and equipment to accomplish nothing then sure.

          • @redtea@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 months ago

            The US was involved in WWII from the beginning. They were just on the side of the Nazis. The State only intervened openly in the end to prevent the spread of communism. Then they made sure to rescue as many Nazis as possible and put them in positions of power in West Germany, the EU, and NATO, etc.

            Since that war, the US has been doing ‘what they pleased’, exactly what the Nazis and what Japan would’ve done. To this day the US tortures, runs concentration camps, and brutally oppresses billions of people around the world.

            Those who argued for the US to stay out were right then, and are still right today.

            • DarraignTheSane
              link
              English
              -511 months ago

              Gotcha, we’ll put you down in the “should have let the Nazis win” column then.

                  • @redtea@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    711 months ago

                    The US was involved in WWII from the beginning. They were just on the side of the Nazis. … Those who argued for the US to stay out were right …

                    I’m really struggling to see how you have interpreted support for the Nazis from this comment.

                    Nevertheless, this is clearly an unconstructive conversation, so I shall end it here.

          • ☭ Comrade Pup Ivy 🇨🇺
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -111 months ago

            I have 2 quick questions 1 how can “Tankies” communists, Marxist Lenninists, The most anti-Facist folks you will ever meet facist supporters?

            Second how exactly is this Putin’s war, as far as I can tell it is Ukraine who violated the Minsk accords for years and that was the inciting incident for this whole thing, now if you could show me how I am wrong I am all ears, but I feel it is irresponsible to pin an entire war on the president of a nation, let alone the one who did not violate the previous agreement

    • BrooklynManOP
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      buddy, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

        • BrooklynManOP
          link
          English
          0
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          you link to a massive report by - ahem - rand - a dubious source of its own, and don’t even bother to explain your point or who this adds anything to back it up. more like you google your position and just linked the first thing that confirmed your bias. you’ve gone from comparing Ukraine to Afghanistan to moving the goalposts to just calling it a proxy war. your argument keeps falling apart and changing.

          if you had an argument to make, you would, rather than relying on something you don’t understand and can’t explain to do it or you.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
            link
            English
            211 months ago

            RAND represents the views of the neocons who run your country, and it outlines the exact scenario we’re seeing unfold in Ukraine as a way for US to weaken Russia. It’s absolutely incredible that Americans continue to believe that each time their country gets involved in a new war that this is going to be the one time you’re on the right side of history.

            I just love how you keep acting smug here while showing utter lack of understanding regarding the subject you’re opining on. Maybe instead of telling me what I do or don’t understand go read the report your deplorable regime wrote.

            • krolden
              link
              English
              011 months ago

              You really have your work cut out for you with all these redditlibs incoming