Canonical is planning an ‘All Snap’ desktop next year. It will likely be available side-by-side with the traditional deb-based installation we’ve been used to since 2004.

If the “All Snap” or “immutable” platform is to be a success, Canonical needs to get a grip on the broken, uninstallable, insecure, and outdated snaps provided in the snap store.

As I mentioned, there’s around five thousand snaps in the store. Hundreds of them haven’t been touched in years. Some developers have just abandoned their packages.

I want to see this situation improve. In general, Canonical should incentivise the promotion of applications and dis-incentivise letting applications languish.

  • makingStuffForFun
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, so, pure Debian nowadays is damn fine. Pop is excellent. No need to bend the knee to this nonsense.

    • Random Dent
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pop is a better Ubuntu than Ubuntu now IMO.

      I really hope the Cosmic desktop turns out to be awesome, that could really set them apart if it works.

    • Yote.zip@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll also put in a vote for Debian Stable as a desktop distro in 2023. Flatpaks have drastically increased Debian Stable’s appeal for home users, and you can now comfortably run a real stable distro while having the ~dozen applications you actually care about stay up to date. If you need more than Flatpaks there’s also Homebrew, Nix, Cargo, deb-get, etc.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pure Debian is fine, if you have a decent grasp of Linux, and don’t want to install two applications with conflicting dependencies.