Marx actually goes into this a bit in Critique of the Gotha Programme, he says something about nature being the source of wealth, pls correct me if I misread that its been a while since I read it and it’s my next read
the source of all value is labour and natural resources, but natural resources have no value without labour, whereas labour can create some kinds of value without natural resources
Marx actually goes into this a bit in Critique of the Gotha Programme, he says something about nature being the source of wealth, pls correct me if I misread that its been a while since I read it and it’s my next read
the source of all value is labour and natural resources, but natural resources have no value without labour, whereas labour can create some kinds of value without natural resources
Aah, that makes sense