• @ZerushOP
    link
    -32 years ago

    I agree on the point that there is not much difference in eating a pig, a cow or a dog, things of custom. Also that dogs usually have a comfortable life, as it should be, but many times people acquire a dog without knowing how to educate it, mistreating it, leaving it alone and unattended all day, when the owners go to work and taking it to pee around the block for 10 minutes. The result is that half of the dogs in the cities become neurotic and sometimes even dangerous and aggressive. Therefore, that the life of the dog is better than that of the wolf can be quite relative.

    • @AgreeableLandscape
      link
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I was specifically referring to the evolutionary fitness of the SPECIES, not the life of an INDIVIDUAL animal. Those are two completely different concepts. There are animals that literally live in the colon of larger animals that are extremely successful as a species, but the lives of the individuals are pretty shitty. The evolutionary process doesn’t care how nice your life is, just that you live long enough to reproduce.

      Should we be mistreating animals then? Hell no! Evolution and human ethics are also two completely different concepts.

      • @ZerushOP
        link
        -12 years ago

        Human ethics is too often quite debatable. With 80% of dogs with obesity problems and breeds so overbred to fit the canons, that almost all large breeds end up with serious hip problems, small breeds that can no longer even give birth without medical assistance and intervention, or these pugs with respiratory problems and chronic eye inflammation. We confuse their gratitude and submission with that they like to be with us, although it is in their nature to see us as the leader of the pack that is followed to death, even when it mistreats them.