cross-posted from: https://yiffit.net/post/1029567

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/2936916

Tech workers react to UPS drivers landing a $170,000 a year package with a mixture of anger and admiration::Some tech workers questioned whether UPS drivers deserved high pay — others jumped in to note the importance of the jobs and harsh working conditions.

  • queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Again

    The sad part is that this job will eventually lead to a 6 figure salary.

    Why. Is. It. Sad. That. Delivery. Drivers. Get. A. Six. Figure. Salary.

    Nothing else you’re saying takes away from the fact that you literally said this.

    • Bonehead@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve edited my comment for clarity.

      Seriously, stop focusing on your misinterpretation of a single statement…

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s all I wanted! When you make a communication error, correct it. Don’t just argue about it lol

        • Bonehead@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I repeatedly clarified my position. I wasn’t arguing about it, I was correcting your misinterpretation.

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s really not, as evident by the statement immediately after that you left out.

            No, you accused me of misinterpreting what you said by leaving things out, but that’s not what happened. The quote I was drilling down on clearly said one thing, even though you meant another, but instead of just saying “oops, what I meant was” you came at me!

            I was just telling you what you sounded like. “Evident”. It wasn’t evident, it was poorly phased.

            • Bonehead@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Right. You couldn’t get past your misinterpretation of a single statement, and ignored everything afterwards that clarified that statement. If you feel that I “came at you”, that again is a misinterpretation. You’re being confrontational. And I’m ending this now.

              • queermunist she/her
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                I didn’t misinterpret shit. I interpreted it the only way it could be read. You miscommunicated.