• @poVoq
    link
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • musicmatze
      link
      12 years ago

      An issues is usually a bug report or similar

      Usually? And when it is not?

      See, I don’t see any reasons why a feature discussion shouldn’t be an issue. “Issue” is just a fancy name for “Discussion”, isn’t it? So basically, these are all some kind of linear or tree-style discussion of some specific topic. There’s nothing more to it, is there?

      So I don’t see why they should be seperate at all. Differentiation can be done via tags, labels, … or whatever you’d like to call it. That’s there already of course.

      • @poVoq
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • musicmatze
          link
          12 years ago

          You don’t seem to be a developer :)

          I have been a developer for over 10 years now.

          If you mix them with general discussions your entire project cycle management system breaks as you can’t have clear milestones etc. with forever open “issues” that are not issues but discussions.

          I don’t see why an issue must be assigned to a milestone, so I don’t see how an issue can break any lifecycle.

          • smallcirclesOPM
            link
            12 years ago

            How an issue is used in a development project is “it depends”. Whatever the chosen and preferred method of the maintainers is. If you really want a concise backlog with concrete stuff, and no “pie in the sky” musings on future major extensions, then Discussion section can be very handy. If you don’t use discussions, you may end in a situation where off-topic’ish issues sit in the backlog like forever, and pile up.