• @TheAnonymouseJoker
    link
    -12 years ago

    It is more absurd that you have to trust closed source over FOSS, when said FOSS product has just about similarly as many eyes on it as Linux kernel. And then you keep justifying Vivaldi due to replaceable bloat features and then claim it is as good for privacy, when it clearly is not.

    You used those random copypasta tech blogs as example, now you use this. Renault and PoleStar are not bastions of privacy, or do privacy advocacy. They are car making corporations for users that use iPhones with Snapchat and Instagram, not people who want privacy on the levels of Firefox on a debloated Android. They use things like Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, and have builtin GPS into cars and have nothing to do with privacy.

    Before:

    Above all, not to sell your data to third parties to earn money. as Firefox/Mozilla (FOSS) does (Alphabet.Inc and NEST, advertising companies of Google)

    Now:

    Firefox is a good browser and FOSS, but it passes user data to Alphabet and NEST, i.e. Google, for funding.

    I notice you lied about this before, and are doing it again now. What is your source for this claim, which is openly known to be false?

      • @TheAnonymouseJoker
        link
        02 years ago

        https://i.imgur.com/hjv47jt.png

        Why do I see nothing here, then? And this does not answer the question, if Mozilla Firefox, the browser, is siphoning data off to Alphabet (Google) and NEST, which has been your implication throughout.

        Above all, not to sell your data to third parties to earn money. as Firefox/Mozilla (FOSS) does (Alphabet.Inc and NEST, advertising companies of Google)

        Firefox is a good browser and FOSS, but it passes user data to Alphabet and NEST, i.e. Google, for funding.