You can add options if what you use isn’t there. :)

  • @jsgohac
    link
    34 years ago

    Fish is appealing to me, though I haven’t invested any time in linking a somewhat extensive set of bash functions, aliases, etc. But sometimes it is nice to drop down into it when working with many files of uncertain names and so on. Do you do much with fish_variables, etc? The documentation seems quite oblique.

    • @ajz
      link
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • @jsgohac
        link
        24 years ago

        Whether people use fish as a main shell or a tool perform certain types of activities is not entirely clear to me. But in my bashrc I have several search functions, timestamps aliases which I find myself inadvertently calling from fish. I could port them over to fish_variables and such, but I don’t really want to maintain two sets of shell customisations. Another example is if you accidentally try to activate a vitualenv … I suspect it is not really meant to be a main shell, but thats why I asked.