• dev_null
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Because he’s not making any political, moral, or personal decisions, and only follows the law he is forced to.

    When the law forces him to sanction Israel, he will do so, and when the law stops forcing him to sanction Russia, he will stop doing so.

    • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      bullshit, his statement was unprofessionally filled with glee at banning russians who he clearly sees as evil as a whole, as he’s banning people who have nothing to do with the war that he has worked with for years just so he can make a libshit stink over it.

      • dev_null
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I completely agree he was unprofessional about it and should have handled it better. It was his choice in how he communicated it, and I think he failed on that point. Having said that, it was not his choice to do it, and I’m sure he will undue it when it’s legally possible. Hopefully using better judgement on his choice of words then.

          • dev_null
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, not nice at all. I’m answering your question on why he doesn’t ban Israeli contributors, not deliberating on the niceness of anyone in particular.